Armenian News
Network / Groong
CASE OF TURKS DISTORTING A 1915 CAPTION
TO A REAL PHOTOGRAPH
WITH THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF TWISTING THE FACTS.
This flagrant disregard for the Truth was more than
enough to annoy an American Missionary physician
who was there to speak up with the full facts.
Armenian News
Network
September 26,
2021
by Abraham D. Krikorian
and Eugene L. Taylor
Probing the Photographic Record
LONG ISLAND, NY
Distorting, NOT Reporting is what it’s all about when it involves Turkish officialdom
and their supporters dealing with the genocides committed by their ancestors.
The most one can elicit from some genocide apologists or deniers are deceptive
and subdued admissions like “yes, serious
inaccuracies may have emerged in various official and semi-official narratives
but….” These statements are supposedly made to reflect that they are being
“fair and balanced.” To quote Professor Henry Giroux of McMaster University in
Ottawa, we are living in an “age of manufactured ignorance.” The Turkish
government has long viewed lying as a sport. In the long run the process, lying
has ultimately become a tradition, especially when it pertains to the late
Ottoman Genocides and keeping the image of the Ottoman state as only slightly
less admirable than perfectly pristine. After all, admitting to the attempts of
their ancestors to wipe out the Armenians and other Christian populations isn’t
anything to be proud of. Admission to their genocides, past or present, has
become a cynical and manipulative affair in Turkey just as it has become in
many other countries.
In short,
euphemisms to obfuscate what provenly amount to deliberate lies are used as a
matter of course; other less circumspect pronouncements
don’t even aim to confuse. They are simply brazen lies. Both techniques have
long been used to shape how a story is to be told.
Turkish
propaganda, especially regarding the Armenian Genocide has long been, and
remains shameless and second to none. Since we are writing from present-day
America, where disinformation is rampant, that is,
bluntly stated, saying a lot. The other Christian genocides (Assyrian and
Greek) don’t even seem to merit lying about; they are by and large kept at a
great distance from any conversation and remain largely undiscussed by the Turkish
government. The regrettable truth is that the political reality is all that
really matters. Some leaders even have the indecency to say they could care
less about the ‘truth.’
We made some
very important and carefully written statements in our recent posting on Groong
entitled “An introduction and some
background to our video “An intimate look at a bronze statue of Emmanuel Fremiet’s “Gorilla and woman” installed in Allerton Park
and Retreat Center, University of Illinois, Monticello, Illinois. Appreciating
more fully a marketing strategy used for the film “ravished armenia,” Armenian News
Network /Groong, September 6, 2021 by Eugene L. Taylor
and Abraham D. Krikorian. (See
https://groong.org/orig/et-20210906.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R42x6DQwSvM)
One of the many carefully written and measured statements made in
that article was as follows:-
“It is easily shown that the present-day country
of Turkey not only inevitably denies that its predecessor State committed
genocide, but reflexively and doggedly defends what ‘really’ happened by
insisting that the Armenian minority constituted a very real threat to the
integrity and security of the Empire by virtue of their being a Fifth column
that clearly, and actively sided
with Turkey’s enemies. One of many examples of this, was nowhere more apparent,
they claim, than in Van. This assertion had nothing to do with reality by the
way. (It is not our intention here to step back in time and defend to the core
every statement we make. We firmly believe in our accuracy and can easily
defend our views with a wide array of references.)”
We have now decided
that we should follow through on this by using a
particularly good example of the practice of brazenly distorting facts.
Although it was long before 1915 that facts were routinely distorted in various
narratives of the many different massacres in the Ottoman Empire, we have
chosen to use this as an example that is emblematic of the long series of
Armenian genocide denials and manipulations. Our example is by an American
missionary who was on site and in a position of authority. It uses a deliberately
mislabeled photograph that caused enough ruckus with the American Missionary
physician to elicit an absolute refutation of a crucial part. Perhaps the most
shocking (or should we say most ‘typical’) aspect of this is that after
the caption had been refuted as inaccurate, it still ended up appearing
in a propaganda booklet put out in Constantinople soon after,
and regularly as late as 1919 (and many reprintings thereafter, the
latest in the 2000s) with a caption that suited the Turkish point of view – and
ignored the correction to the initial published photographs and the full truth
impeccably provided. This certainly must qualify as a great example of Turks in
authority and their supporters taking “eye-witness” testimony about
the genocide and turning it into “hearsay.” In no way was the Ottoman
Government going to lose narrative control via any views at odd with their
version.
To begin at
the beginning, we examine an article entitled “Exterminating the Armenians”
that appeared in the Leslie’s Digest for
October 9, 1915 on pg. 767. Accompanying it was a
photograph captioned “Armenians Fighting
for their Lives” (Figs. 1a and 1b.) Note that the photograph credits the well-known, non-Turkish firm Underwood & Underwood as the source!
Fig. 1a.
The photograph’s caption describes the image as showing “Armenian entrenchments in “The Gardens,”
a suburb of Van, in Asiatic Turkey during the recent siege by the Turks. Taken
unaware and many of them massacred, the Armenians fled to the American Mission
Compound, fortified it and directed their fight against the Turks from that
place until the Turks retired.”
(See Fig. 1b. below for an enlargement of the photograph.)
Fig. 1b.
The next
step in the story appears in Leslie’s
Illustrated Weekly Newspaper, October 14, 1915 in a
section that was regularly featured under the broad title “The Trend of Public Opinion” presented by journalist Charles Bates
Strayer. It included an article with the same photograph that appears in Fig.
1a. and 1b.
above. Here, shown in Fig. 2., the scene was described as “Armenians defending themselves from the Turks.” It continues “Scene in the trenches of the Armenians in
“The Gardens” just outside of the city of Van, Asiatic Turkey, during the
recent siege of that place by the Turks. The majority of
the Armenians who were Christians fled to the American Mission Compound and
directed their fight from that place. The Turks abandoned the siege after heavy
loss.”
Fig. 2.
The saga continues.
On October 18, 1915 in the New York Times one finds on
pg. 8 a letter to the Editor written by one Zia Mufty-Zade
Bey, an attaché to the Turkish Embassy. A little digging
shows that he was the son of a Reschid Pasha,
later described as “formerly Foreign Minister and new Turkish delegate to
London.” Zia Mufty-Zade Bey’s letter was published
with the heading “The Kind of Armenian a
Turk Knows.” The heading continues, “They
betray their rulers, take refuge in Christian missions, and have to be dealt
with as dangerous rebels.”
This letter
was commented on by a New York City Armenian named O.T. Malghazouny
who wrote a letter to the New York
Tribune 4 November 1915 pg. 10 drawing attention to the “absurd utterances”
in Zia Mufty-Zade Bey’s letter. Expectedly, this, in
turn, was responded to by yet another letter from Zia Mufty-Zade
Bey on Nov. 9, 1915 on pg. 8 of the Tribune with the
heading “Christians under Moslem rule.”
The heading then goes on to tip off the reader saying that “Zia Mufty Zade Bey
answers the charges of an Armenian critic who championed the Armenians.”
Enter to the
story the defender of the truth of this caption and story
Missionary Doctor Dr. Clarence Douglas Ussher. Dr. Ussher was born in Aurora,
Illinois on September 5, 1870. He graduated from Kansas Medical School and entered into Mission service for the American Board, going
to Harpoot in 1898. He continued to Van in July, 1898 and married Elizabeth F. Barrows in June 1900. Sadly she died of typhus July 14, 1915 in Van. She was born
in Caesaria to a prominent missionary family.
War
conditions and the virtual shut-down of operations for
Armenians in Van prompted Dr. Ussher to leave Turkey. He returned to America,
reaching New York October 14, 1915. One can only guess
at what narratives he was exposed to upon his return concerning news
about what was happening in Armenia. We believe that he kept up with what was
in the news, and submitted a letter to the New York
Tribune that was published on Friday, November 12, 1915 pg. 8. (See Figs. 4a. and 4b.) It was interesting that the Tribune
published on the same page, directly above the letter from Ussher a cartoon
captioned Herod- “For how much less I
became infamous”. (See Fig. 3.).
Fig. 3.
For
those interested in Herod the Great, (see Park, 2013 in the References).
The heading
for Ussher’s letter is “An American Eyewitnesses’s story of the ghastly crimes committed by the
Turkish authorities.” Unfortunately, the newspaper page on which the letter
is printed is not of the greatest quality (some sections are very light
rendering it near-impossible to read) but we have used
an option available to us of using a very early
source that is vastly easier to read.
Figs. 4a.
and 4b. show Dr. Ussher’s letter in two parts. Since it may be difficult for
some to read these copies of the letter to the newspaper
we have re-typed it in full following the images of the letter.
Fig.
4a.
Fig.
4b.
THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES
An American Eyewitness’s Story of the
Ghastly Crimes Committed by the
Turkish Authorities
To the Editor of the Tribune.
Sir:
This morning’s Tribune has a letter from His Excellency Zia Mufti-Zadi Bey in reply to a letter from a Mr. O. T. Malghazouny, published November 4. I do not happen to have
seen the letter to which he refers, but inasmuch as I
was in Van during the entire siege and in close touch with both Moslems and
Christians, I beg you to give this letter publicity equal to that given to Zia
Bey’s letter in to-day’s issue.
I
note that he draws attention to the fact that Mr. Malghazouny
“does not deny the rebellion of the Armenians at Van.” I have been told that
Zia Bey published
in “The Times” in October a letter in which he made the charge that the
Armenians of Van rebelled and that the Ottoman government was suppressing
rebellion in the measures it took against the Armenians. He used a photograph
published in “The Literary Digest” of October 9 as proof that the Armenians
aided them. It is unfortunate that those
in prominent official positions, like Zia Bey, should be misinformed and
endeavor to protect the good name of their governments by errors in statement.
Permit
me to say, first, that “The Literary Digest” by the explanation under the
above-mentioned photograph misinformed Zia Bey. This stated that the Armenians,
taken unawares and many of them massacred, fled to the American Mission
compound, fortified it and directed their fight
against the Turks from that place until the Turks retired. The first part of
this statement is true, the latter part utterly false. The trench photograph
was a full mile from the American mission compound. The compound was never
fortified in any way, and all through the siege its neutrality was maintained.
No
armed man was permitted to enter the premises, even cartridge belts being
removed at the gate when men with revolvers desired to come to see some
relative or friend. No shot was ever fired from the American Mission at the
Ottoman forces or any others, and the Americans were so determined to preserve
the neutrality and extra-territoriality of their premises that they assured the
Governor General, Jevdet Bey, a brother-in-law of Damed-Enver Pacha, that they would themselves shoot anyone
who dared to fire from the American premises be he Christian or Muslim, civil
or military.
During
the siege there were more than twenty Ottoman soldiers in the American mission
hospital and six thousand Armenian refugees, mostly women and children, in the
mission compound. After the siege the Armenians brought us about one thousand
Mussulman refugees, men, women and children, and a number of
wounded and sick Turkish soldiers, and all were tenderly cared for by American
and Armenian Christians and the Russian Red Cross workers.
As
to their revolution or rebellion of Armenians as a cause of the massacres and other atrocities
by the Turkish military, the facts are as follows: From the beginning of the
mobilization it was made perfectly evident that it was the determination of the
government to ruin the non-Muslims. The men were removed from their homes and
shops and then their houses and shops were plundered in the name of the
government. Cooking utensils, copper vessels, bedding, clothing, food and other things, even bric-a-brac, were seized, and
the meanest Turkish gendarme was given powers supposed to lie only in the hands
of a court martial.
Both
in the Army and out of it many Armenians were shot down, and payment of “badal,” or exemption money, was no protection. Americans
would have rebelled under one-tenth of the provocation, but Armenians did not.
Turkish officers took Armenians out of the ranks, on the march, tied them to
telegraph poles and shot them, with no better excuse than the accusation that
they wanted to desert. Self-respecting and faithful Armenians in the Army were
disarmed and made the slaves of Turkish soldiers. Sickness and starvation were
rife among them, and their starving families at home were uncared for by the
government. Murders of Armenians in the Army were frequent. There were
desertions, but the Kurds deserted in much larger numbers. I wonder would not
Zia Bey have deserted under such circumstances, when
it was evident his government did not trust and did not want him?
In spite of all this and a thousand times more, of which I
must not write, the Armenians did not rebel. I could tell of petty massacres
and the terrorizing of communities by police and gendarmes. The Armenian
leaders pleaded with the downtrodden, exasperated Armenians not to resist or in
any way give the government an excuse for severe measures. The extermination of
the Armenians had been decreed by the Constantinople authorities, the leaders
of the Young Turks, whose motto is “Turkey for the Turks.” First the leaders of
the people were to be removed, and four of the leading Armenians, invited by
the Governor General to hold a peace conference to bring about harmony in Shadakh, where foully murdered the first night en route, by the governor’s orders. Soldiers were sent to Shadakh with orders to wipe out the Armenian population and
no secret was made of the orders. The Armenian member of Parliament was seized
and deported. The inhabitants of the villages of Haigatsore
were massacred by the governor’s special regiment, and mutilated women, girls
and even infants, who after days in the mountains were brought to our hospital,
testified to the ruthlessness of the attack.
Only
at the sixth village, when it was evident that a general massacre was on, did
the Armenians begin to resist. There less than half a dozen young men held the
attacking force off until some of the women and children could escape to the
mountains. This was April 17 and 18. Soldiers and gendarmes had been quartered
in nearly all the villages and instructed to complete the massacre on Monday, the
19th. The Kaimakam of Arjesh,
trusted by the Armenians, called the men to the government building and,
marching them out under guard in companies of fifty, shot down two thousand five
hundred, regardless of their having paid their “badal”
and contributed in many ways to the government.
These
rumors reaching Van, it is not strange that the Armenians were uneasy and ready
to defend themselves when attacked on Tuesday, April 20, and they did defend
themselves heroically throughout a siege at twenty-eight days. About sixty men
in the walled city and twelve hundred in the garden city, variously armed with
every kind of firearm, ancient and modern, except machine guns and cannon, held
off the Ottoman forces and artillery till the Turks fled. Then they burned the
Turkish quarter, less the Turks should return and renew the attack. They did
not know that a Russian army was approaching until two days after the siege was
raised. With their lack of proper arms and ammunition, the Armenians would not
have dared to rebel and attack the trained Turkish army.
Knowing
what I do of Turkish official reports, I am not surprised that Zia Bey is
misinformed, and I trust this statement of facts will change his opinion on
some points, I can vouch for the above statements from personal knowledge.
CLARENCE
D. USSHER, M. D.,
Chief of Staff of the American Red
Cross Hospital at Van, Turkey.
East Hartford, Conn., Nov. 9, 1915.
Quite early
on, the Ottoman government decided to put out some propaganda that sought to explain
what was happening at the hands of the Government. The first ‘apology’, only 8
pages long (not shown), was entitled “Verité
sur le movement Révolutionnaire…” (1916). It had
no illustrations. At the other extreme, in terms of propaganda, two short volumes
were published in late 1916 in Constantinople which were largely comprised of
images supposedly proving that the Armenians were revolutionaries. We show the
covers of these in Figs. 5a. and 5b. Each clearly states that the contents are
presented with commentary and captions in Ottoman Turkish, in French, in
German, and in English.
Fig. 5a. Fig.
5b.
This work
with a range of rearranged titles and covers went through a
number of reprints, some as late as 2003. None of the reprints or the
originals had very good quality images.
On page 53
of book 1 is a photograph (Fig. 6.), whose caption in English reads “Armenians fighting in the trenches
against the Turks for the purpose of facilitating the occupation of the city of
Van by the Russians.” The source of the photograph is not given but it is clear that it is a clipping from what we have shown
above as Fig. 2.
Fig. 6.
A few other
photographs from western sources all make it clear that
the Turkish perspective on the entire matter is that Armenians are in revolt
and have taken cowardly refuge in the American Compound.
It
has always been a source of amazement to us that those who put the illustrated
propaganda booklets together felt obliged to use an American source with a
distorted caption to tell their ‘side’ of the story. One would have thought
that there were plenty of opportunities to take more telling photographs and
used them instead of resorting to a publication put out in America?
References
(Anonymous)
Vérité sur le movement révolutionnaire arménien et
les mesures gouvernmentals. (Constantinople, 1916). No publisher
indicated. 16 pgs., 1916. (Harvard University’s copy bears a mark of its origin
with the stamp of the British Chief Postal Censor).
(Anonymous, 1916) Die Ziele
und Taten armenischer Revolutionäre = The Armenian aspirations and revolutionary
movements= Aspirations et mouvements révolutionaires arméniens = Ermeni ȃmal ve
harekȃt i ihtiliyyesi tesȃvir ve vesȃlik.
Evénénements
insurrectionnels qui ont nécessité le déplacements des
Armeniens. (Constantinople,
1919). No publisher indicated. 54 pgs. , University of
Toronto Library copy indicates that it was presented as a gift from the Turkish
Embassy.
Charny,
Israel W. (2021) Israel’s Failed Response to the Armenian Genocide. Denial,
State deception, truth versus politicization of history. With three
contemporary updates by a Turk, An Armenian, and a Jew. Ragip
Zakarolu, Richard Hovannisian, Michael Berenbaum. Academic
Studies Press, Boston.
Giroux,
Henry A. ( 2021.) Race,
Politics, and Pandemic Pedagogy: Education in a time of crisis. Loomsbury Academic: London and London.
Kaligian, Dikran
(2014) Anatomy of denial: manipulating sources and manufacturing a rebellion. Genocide Studies International 8 (2),
pgs. 208-223.
Kieser, Hans-Lukas, Margaret Lavinia
Anderson, Seyhan Bayraktar
and Thomas Schmutz. The End of the
Ottomans. The genocide of 1915 and the politics of Turkish Nationalism.
(2019) I.B. Tauris, New York.
Krikorian, Abraham D. and Taylor, Eugene L.
(October 4, 2014) 99 Years Ago Today:- Who Knew What,
When and How about “The Massacres that Would Change the Meaning of Massacre.” The
Committee on Armenian Atrocities in New York City’s Release for Publication in
Papers of Monday, Oct. 4, 1915
https://groong.org/orig/ak-20141004.html.
Park,
Eugene Eung-Chun (2013) “Rachel’s cry for her
children Matthew’s treatment of the infanticide by Herod.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly vol. 75 (no. 3), pgs. 473-485.
Ussher,
Clarence D. and Knapp, Grace H. (1917) An
American Physician in Turkey. A narrative of adventures in peace and war.
Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston and New York.
Yavuz, M. Hakan (2014) The
First World War in the Middle East. Special Issue. Guest Editor M. Hakan Yavuz. Middle East Critique vol. 23, Number 2, (U.K. Routledge
Journals,
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19436149.2014.905082
© Copyright 2021 Armenian News
Network/Groong and the authors.
All Rights Reserved.
| Home | Administrative | Introduction | Armenian News | Podcasts | Feedback |