Armenian News Network / Groong
Documentation
and Attribution of Photographs as they Relate to the Atrocities and Genocide
Committed against Armenians in the Ottoman Turkish Empire:
several
early photos of survivors released for educational use and in soliciting funds
by the American committee for armenian and syrian relief - complete with contemporary captions and
interpretations
Armenian News Network / Groong
September 14, 2017
Special to
Groong by Eugene L. Taylor and Abraham D. Krikorian
Long Island, NY
INTRODUCTION
For those
who respects facts, there never has been any question about the reality of the
genocide committed against the Armenians by Ôthe TurksÕ. Indeed, more and more details of the Armenian
Genocide are slowly but surely emerging as a result of the relentless labors of
a handful of dedicated and capable scholars. Information and facts that have long
lain dormant are steadily being discovered or resurrected, minutely dissected
and fastidiously interpreted.
An
impressive amount of work has been accomplished in a relatively few years. It would be difficult to provide a
bibliography of recent publications since there are so many. The field has now evolved to the stage
where reference works like dictionaries and encyclopedias of genocide are
routinely including contributions on the Armenian Genocide. Needless to say, these entries
acknowledge unreservedly the genocide(s) committed in the Ottoman Turkish Empire.[Endnote
1 and Appendix at the end.]
A wide range
of publications such as these confirm that although the historical work at the
level of minutiae is in the hands of a relatively few, it is moving forward
unabatedly, yielding ever-greater detail, nuance and fineness of grain. In short, the quality of all this work
is such that it can be more or less readily summarized, digested and offered
for use in Reference Publications.
These can serve both as underpinning for general studies, or points of
departure for much broader analytical and interpretive work by a larger
community of genocide scholars, writers of social histories, students at all
levels, artists, poets and even film makers.
By the time
we first started our work in earnest after our retirement some 17 years ago, we
had read enough and knew enough to appreciate that the Armenian Genocide
presented many unresolved problems that would have to be dealt with at levels
and in ways that we were not qualified to carry out. After all, we were scientists, not
genocide scholars – whatever that may mean.
We
appreciated all too well the simple and clear message of Dr. Gerard Libaridian,
namely that full recognition of the reality of the Armenian Genocide was not
an
historiographic problem, it was a political one, and had to be taken
seriously. It meant that if we were
to be scrupulously honest (and we always strive to be) we had to admit that we were
not equipped to attack the problem head on. (Incidentally, so far as progress on the
political front in the USA is concerned, the State of Iowa recently recognized
the reality of the Armenian Genocide.
In so doing, it became the 47th state to do so; only Indiana,
Mississippi, and Alabama remain recalcitrant.)[2]
Given the
facts of the situation, and these facts shouted out at us in stark relief quite
a few years ago, we concluded that we could best play a meaningful role by
facing the challenge of locating and identifying visual materials relevant to
massacres, deportations, genocide and the like such as photographs, relevant
imagery including posters used in fund-raising for relief of survivors, maps et
cetera – in short, the entire gamut.[3]
We believed
then, and still believe, that a strong, even impeccable data base is needed -
comprised of so-called Òstock photosÓ that would withstand the most rigorous
examination. The data base would
enable prospective users to have access to the best quality images possible
– images that are as properly attested and attributed as possible —preferably
at no cost or little cost to users.
More than a
few of the existing photos of the ÒArmenian persecutions,Ó a phrase nominally
justified by some because the word ÒgenocideÓ had not yet been coined when what
happened to the Armenians was occurring, are not as well attributed and
attested as they might be.[4]
Much has
been made of by Turks and those who espouse ÒThe Official Turkish point of
viewÓ regarding what they see as the use or display of deliberately faked or
contrived photos so as to depict the Armenian Genocide and to vilify the
Turks. They accuse users of such
photographs of unconscionable dishonesty and assert that these photographs are
not part of the historic record because they are doctored and selected for
political advocacy that is shamefully unscrupulous. The thinking, whether openly stated or
implied, goes that since they are ÒfakeÓ photographs, then it follows naturally
that everything else being claimed is fake as well.[5]
Admittedly,
more than a few problems must be faced.
Firstly, there are very few photographs that
serve as evidence that mass murders did take place. The results of these mass murders have,
however, indeed been photographed.
We have devoted considerable attention to the photographs of the mass
murders which were taken at Lake Gšljuk in Mamuret ul Aziz in 1915 by United
States Consul Leslie A. Davis.[6]
And, it is
true that there are photos that nominally depict actual massacre in progress or
supposedly portray what did happen in an authentic manner. Even so, these have often been
carelessly captioned and are readily exposed as artistic renderings. Others of this genre are artistic
renderings generated by survivors who vividly recalled what happened. They either drew the scenes themselves
or supervised their rendition. None
of these artistic renderings, so far as we know, shows mass murder in process
or progress. It would be highly
unusual if such did exist. (We
shall deal in a future posting with a few examples of such portrayals.)
Secondly, many photographs that can be
attested or attributed concentrate on survivors, especially orphan
children. Such photos also often
provide views of those who escaped massacre by fleeing, hiding or the
like. Others survived because they
emerged from the midst of slain corpses, often by feigning death, or were
unconscious and later crawled out over the dead.[7]
These are
perhaps most accurately described as photographs of survivors of genocidal
actions. The number of
photographs in this category are large indeed. Also falling into that category as well
are photographs of those who were taken into Muslim households for reasons that
were altruistic or not-so-altruistic but then Ôchucked outÕ as we irreverently
put it, when it no longer suited the household. Others did everything possible to run
away and escaped from situations that were ÔtroublesomeÕ for any number of
reasons.
The lack of
rigor in dealing with photographs that were available at the time of the
massacres and nominal ÒdeportationsÓ or ÒrelocationsÓ have indeed created some
problems. In a word, they have provided
Ôgrist for the unending millÕ of those who work diligently and tirelessly to
deny the reality of the Armenian Genocide.
But we have argued that they did not really emerge as a result of
mischievous intent. It was
essentially the case then, as even nowadays in many instances, not a high
priority to go out of oneÕs way to get all the facts of the case, given any
particular photograph or image.
This does not only apply to the Armenian case. After all, conventional modern
historians have never thought that images were really important and many still
do not. Few seemed to have worried
about such Ôminor detailsÕ which occurred over a hundred years ago.
We will not
dwell on the matter of careless use of poorly attested or misattributed or
unattributed photographs or imagery by professionals who draw salaries in their
posts. When all is said and done,
errors made regarding alleged time frame when atrocities or persecutions
occurred are not earth shattering.
Indeed, there is imagery dealing with a ÔrichÕ range of atrocities
against Armenians spanning many years, not just the Hamidian massacres of 1894
to 1896, the Cilician or ÔAdanaÕ massacres of 1909 and ultimately the Armenian
Genocide (spanning the years 1915 to 1922), if we may be permitted to use a perverted
word ÔrichÕ to draw from. They vary
also as to location and intensity.
Inadequacy
of photographs presented have been oftentimes used as a lynchpin to cast
aspersions on the reality of the massacres and genocide – indeed a
genocide which the official Turkish point of view proponents claimed from the
outset had never occurred. They
doggedly insist these photographs have long been used, and are still being used
to support a fanciful, imagined non-existent genocide!
The late Dr.
Sybil Milton, an expert on images and film from the Nazi era recognized that even
such images generated much later than those of the Armenian Genocide period, were
not as well attested or attributed as one might suspect. Indeed, we have drawn particular
attention in one of our publications to the fact that had photographs and film
records not been ordered by General Dwight D. Eisenhower after he had seen the
Ohrdruf subcamp of Buchenwald, one would probably encounter more concerted
efforts to deny the Nazi holocaust waged against the Jews, the Sinti and Roma
(gypsies), JehovahÕs Witnesses, asocials, homosexuals, the handicapped,
political dissidents, Poles, and Soviet prisoners of war between 1933 and 1945.
Outside the
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. one can read in
chiseled stone what Eisenhower wrote in 1945:-
ÒThe things I saw beggar
description. The visual evidence
and the verbal testimony of starvation, cruelty and bestiality were so
overpowering... if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to change
these allegations to propaganda.Ó[8]
Dr. Milton
summed up very succinctly the problems that poorly attested or authenticated
photographs presented.
ÒEven
otherwise punctilious scholars routinely publish Holocaust photographs without
identifying the event, date, or authorship of the image, although they would
never handle written records in this cavalier fashion.Ó[9]
SOME BACKGROUND ON THE
PHOTOGRPAHY BELOW
A major
problem confronting anyone who wants to categorize photographs in any sensible
way is that one hardly knows where to begin when starting from scratch or
wishing to fact check. In our own
case, the avenues open to various approaches have been disparate and often
unexpected. One has to cast a broad
net so to speak. This is much easier
said than done. It is also very
rare to encounter photographs in collections which include negatives.[10]
One can try
to sort by timeframe, location or specific place, specific events(s) depicted
or characterized. The difficulty is
that there is much potential over-lap – much like the proverbial dŽja vu
all over again! The Armenians
underwent so many movements that were very erratic and disruptive, if we choose
for the moment to describe them very euphemistically. Figuring out who was where, when, and
why is always a problem.
Much
information is available for study and evaluation, but much is confusing, and
imagery is not nearly as well labeled as desirable, if indeed it is labeled at
all, and there are inevitably a number of pitfalls that one can fall into. Even library entries of items in places
that one would normally expect to be expertly cataloged are not always
reliable.[11]
PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN IN
THE CAUCASUS
What we give
below is a summary description that we have found helpful throughout our
studies in gaining and maintaining a broad perspective on what was happening
and when, especially in the Caucasus.
But, before
we present this summary, and set the scene so to speak, we will start with a
few words taken from a letter written to people back home by a young woman
volunteer worker, Amy Burt from Oakland, California, stationed in the Caucasus.
Her
non-description ÒdescriptionÓ of what she encountered during her service is
short and clear –
ÒÉthe
hordes of freezing, starving humanity old and young was too terrible to
describe.Ó[12]
We shall see
that the Caucasus is of special significance for the photographs that we are
presenting here.
A SKETCH OF RELIEF
EFFORTS THAT WERE NEEDED
Now, we take
the reader to the straightforward summary entitled ÒArmenian and Syrian Relief.Ó
We provide this in double quotes.
This summary was printed in an issue of the New Armenia (1917) and should provide readers a ÔmapÕ so to say of
the events of the period. In our
opinion, this digest offers the most clear-cut summary of the situation.[13]
ÒTwenty
thousand fatherless children of Armenian and Syrian refugees in the Caucasus
are in need of immediate aid to save them from demoralization and
starvationÉÓ ÒThere are 300,000
Armenian and Syrian refugees from Turkey, mostly women and children, as the men
were massacred by the Turks.
ÒThe Turks
made three drives against Russia, which brought into the Caucasus, which is
Russian, large numbers of refugees.Ó
In 1914 more than 60,000 Armenians fled the Russian advance. The next year 30,000 more migrated.
ÒThe third
drive is known as the Alashgert campaign of July, 1915. The Armenians of the district of
Alasghert in Turkey were by it compelled to flee to the Caucasus. It also caused the evacuation of the
city of Van by the Russians. This
city had been defended in April and May by the Armenian population against a
strong Turkish army. Russian aid
had arrived just in time to save it, and the Turks ran away, but when the
Russians heard of the Turkish advance towards Alashgert, fearing their line of
retreat might be cut off, they evacuated Van and retreated to the Caucasus,
taking with them all the Armenians and Syrians there.
ÒThis was by
far the largest influx of refugees.
They were attacked by Kurds on the way and 7,000 were killed. About 20,000 died of cholera, typhoid,
and typhus after reaching Russia.
The total number of refugees from Van and vicinity was about 200,000. In these ways some 300,000 people came
to the Caucasus in great destitution, after losing large numbers, especially of
men, and all their possessions.
ÒRelief work
by the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief began in January,
1916, and is still going on and growing in extent and importance. The Russian government has helped the refugees
generously, having given them up to the present nearly $10,000,000. This supplied them with food, paid their
rent, and made it possible to provide for 5,000 orphans, but owing to the
financial difficulties of the government this aid is now cut off.Ó[14]
We make no
pretense that the aforesaid summary presents a full picture, but for the time
being it will have to do.
A WORD ABOUT THE IMAGES
INCLUDED HERE
The photos
below (published initially one to a single page) derive from the so-called
ÒFirst SeriesÓ put out by the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief
entitled ÒSixteen Striking ScenesÓ[15]
It will be
obvious that we have not included all sixteen images. We have selected only seven. These we believe are the most
ÒstrikingÓ. As an aside, we
would hardly have selected the word ÒstrikingÓ to describe the photographs but
on checking the Oxford Dictionary of the English language we read that
Striking may
have simply been a word then in common use. Most of us use the word striking in the
context of physical beauty – worthy of a second or even more glances.
But the fact
is from what we read in the first image of ÒSixteen Striking ScenesÓ, not many
photographs were available at the time.
So far as we know, this ÒFirst SeriesÓ is the only one released under
that designation or rubric. Of
course, there were many more photographs taken, both informal and professional,
that were released over the years.
That is a story unto itself that will have to remain for another day to
tackle and relate.
In our
Appendix we have included in its entirety following the Endnotes section, scans
from the Congressional Record entry on the formalization of the relief
organizations and their genesis.
One will surmise that the history provided on page 3 is pertinent for
people such as ourselves seeking to place photographs in a specific time frame.
In summary,
at the time the ÒSixteen ScenesÓ were released, one had to do with what one
had. Parenthetically, we will one
day provide some far more ÔstrikingÕ examples that we have collected and placed
in three-ring file folders labeled seemingly cavalierly ÒTear Jerker PhotosÓ
– no disrespect meant for such serious and tragic imagery. The
designation is self-explanatory. No
need to go into that just now.
We also
believe that it is important for us to point out emphatically that use of
rather restrained, measured, even diplomatic language (for lack of a better
word) in the legends was deemed necessary for the following reasons.
(1) The main fear was that use of too
blunt and direct language would annoy Ôthe TurksÕ and further arise their ire
causing even more violent actions.
It would make it much more difficult to minister aid and relief to
survivors. There is much evidence
of considerable waffling (to use a very accurate word) as to whether relief
would be allowed directly to Armenians.
In areas controlled by Turkey, efforts were constantly afoot by the
likes of Enver Pasha and others to secure aid for anyone deemed as needy
(usually not Armenians) through the Turkish central government. That is another story unto itself. And to make it perfectly clear , at the
outset NO AID was permitted. This
position eased with time under pressure and the appreciation on the part of the
Turk leadership that it would do no good to the Turkish cause if it was
recalcitrant on that point. It
would indeed be difficult, even impossible to reconcile the great need of the
Armenian orphans etc., and the argument proffered, namely that carefully
planned and executed ÒrelocationsÓ by the Ottoman government had been carried
out.
(2) The other reason is that the full extent
of the Turkish actions were not yet completely appreciated. Westerners could
not fully appreciate or want to believe despite it being said over and over
again, that the Òdeath of a nationÓ was really in progress. As soon as the genocide began, the Turkish
government began denial of what it was.
We dare to say that Ôthe TurksÕ were experts at denial and
propaganda. (That too is yet
another story.)
(3) The mess the world is in today and
the ongoing genocides of ÔothersÕ owes much in our opinion to the impunity that
so characterized and still characterizes the genocide committed by the Ottoman
Turks against the Armenians. Again,
that is yet one more story.
SELECTION OF
PHOTOGRAPHS
We again
emphasize that the pictures were selected because they are particularly
relevant and instructive. The
captions or legends were all re-typed from printed pages of copies because the
quality of the prints was not as good as the glossy photo prints which we
present here. The typeface is
inevitably much clearer and better using a modern word processor than that which
was achievable years ago with letter press. We tried to pick a font which was
equivalent to the Ôoriginal.Õ
We again
state that the scans of photographs presented here derive not from the printed
or distributed version of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief
publication. They derive mostly
from quality period photographs that were unearthed by the late Karekin Dikran,
originally from Beirut, and later from Denmark. He interacted with a number of
individuals at the time we corresponded with him and it seems likely that there
are a number of ÔsetsÕ available since he and a very few others were generous
in their distribution.[16] The
photographs we elected not to present here are really not worth mentioning in
our view. They are hardly
ÒstrikingÓ enough to suit us.
Recall the old adage that ÒIf you cannot get what you want, You better
want what you can get!Ó
Although we
never met Karekin, we communicated by email for some time (he contacted one of
us -ADK- some years ago and we kept up a correspondence and interaction). Before he died, he shared on discs a
range of photographs and other works that he had obtained and collected -
including many of the genocide commemoration posters he produced. These posters are among the most vivid productions
we have ever seen. He had an
incredible eye and gift for color.
We never did get a response to queries such as ÒHow do you get such
vivid colors and vibrance?Ó
ENDNOTES
[1] Totten,
Samuel and Paul R. Totten (eds.) 2009. The
Genocide Studies Reader. xvi, 552
pgs. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London. Reference to the Armenian Genocide is
scattered throughout, referred to by scholars as Passim; [entries contributed by 24 distinguished authors]. 2015. Armenian Genocide in Modern Genocide. The
definitive resource and document collection. Volume 1: Armenian Genocide, Bosnian
Genocide, and Cambodian Genocide (Paul R. Barotrope and Stephen Leonard Jacobs,
eds.) ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, California; Denver, Colorado; Oxford, England,
pgs. 3-178; Kaiser, Hilmar. 2010[2013] Genocide at the Twilight of the Ottoman
Empire, in The Oxford Handbook of
Genocide Studies (Donald Bloxham and A. Dirk Moses, eds.) Oxford University
Press, Oxford, pgs. 365-385.
[2] Indeed,
it can be argued that virtually all or at least most unacknowledged genocides constitute political problems not historiographic
ones!
[4] See Krikorian, Abraham D. and Eugene
L. Taylor (2011) Achieving ever-greater precision in attestation and
attribution of genocide photographs, in The Genocide of the Ottoman
Greeks. Studies on the
state-sponsored campaign of extermination of the Christians of Asia Minor, 1912
– 1922 and its aftermath: history, law, memory (Tessa Hofmann, Matthias
Bj¿rnlund, Vasileios Meichanetsides, eds.) Aristide D. Caratzas, New York &
Athens, pgs. 389 – 434; Tessa Hofmann and G. Koutcharian (1992)
Ô"Images that horrify and indict": pictorial documents on the
persecution and extermination of Armenians from 1877 to 1922Õ in The
Armenian Review, 45, 53-184.
[5] For the
case of a faked photograph using composite, overlay and re-photographing
techniques see Krikorian, A.D. and Taylor, E.L. (2010, February 22) The saga surrounding a forged photograph from the era of the
Armenian genocide demonizing and vilifying a "cruel Turkish
official": a part of "the rest of the story." http://www.groong.org/orig/ak-20100222.html. One should also be aware of a long, drawn out affair over
a contested photograph of a hanging alleged to be of
Armenians. The Turkish side was
adamant in its insistence that the photograph was not properly attested or
attributed and tried to effect its permanent removal. See ÒRecords Relating to the Removal and
Replacement of Armenian History Exhibit Photographs, Ellis Island Museum of
Immigration, Statue of Liberty National Monument.Ó The partial file may be
accessed at https://catalog.archives.gov/id/40944520. It covers a period from the late
1980s to the early 1990s. It was a lengthy, nasty affair.
[6] See ÒUnited States Consul Leslie A. DavisÕs Photographs
of Armenians Slaughtered at Lake Goeljuk, Summer of 1915Ó by Abraham D.
Krikorian and Eugene L. Taylor, pgs.169 -197 in Festschrift
Wolfgang zum 80. Geburtstag (Ed. by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach) 2015. Verlag
Dinges & Frick, Wiesbaden. [This paper has been made available on the
Internet through the kind permission of Muriel Mirak-Weissbach who allowed us
to post it on Groong April 7, 2017. The Festschrift volume was prepared in
honor of German Journalist and Scholar Wolfgang Gust on the Occasion of his 80th Birthday,
2015.]. (See Armenian News Network
/ Groong, April 7, 2017 http://www.groong.org/orig/ak-20170407.html)
[7] One of
us (ADK) had a female relative who had been thrown into a well along with the
dead. Being wounded but still
alive, she was able to dig out from amongst the bodies.
[8] For full
citation of the relevant literature see pg. 391 of the first entry in Endnote
4.
When we
visited the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library & Museum in Abilene,
Kansas a few years ago, we learned that his parents were initially Mennonites
(River Brethren sect) but then, when he was still a youngster, they turned to
the so-called Watch Tower Society whose common designation became the JehovahÕs
Witnesses. They pointed out that when he was inaugurated President a Watch
Tower printed Bible was used when he took his second oath of office. In his adulthood, Ike became a
communicant of the Presbyterian National Church. We wonder whether Eisenhower knew then
that the NaziÕs had so escalated their persecution not only of Jews but also of
the ÒInternational Bible StudentsÓ [JehovahÕs Witnesses] - people such as his
parents. Probably not.
[9] Milton,
Sybil, 1987. The camera as weapon,
voyeur, and witness: photography of the Holocaust as historical evidence, in
Visual Explorations of the World,
selected papers from the International Conference on Visual Communication
(Martin Tuaregs and Jay Ruby, eds.), Rader Verlag, Aachen, pgs. 80 -114. at pg.
82.
[10] The
detailed and carefully researched works of Raymond KŽvorkian are especially
valuable in trying to deal with locations and time frame. See especially The Armenian Genocide. A complete history (2006, I.B. Tauris,
London and New York, viii, 1029 pages!)
As it turns out, the photograph on the dust jacket of the
English-language edition is incorrectly attested. We wrote a ÔpaperÕ and posted it on
Groong, the Armenian News Network on September 22, 2015 entitled Correction to a Photograph of ÒArmenian Widows with their ChildrenÓ
Wrongly Dated 1915. It actually dates from 1909. Plus a comment on
why it is important to get an accurate Ôpaper trailÕ for photographs. We can again say that this is an
irony. We have stated that we doubt
that Dr. KŽvorkian had much say as to what went on the cover.
We shall
also point out to readers that we have devoted more than a little time
correcting descriptions to images and photographs in the Library of Congress
collections. See our Groong entries
at http://www.groong.org/orig/Probing-the-Photographic-Record.html
[11] The
images that comprise the Near East Relief photo materials of Laurence Howland
MacDaniels and his wife, Frances Cochran MacDaniels are exceptional in that
there are many negatives. We
studied this collection some years ago.
The efforts of these studies may be seen, but only in a relatively small
part, at http://dcollections.oberlin.edu./cdm/landingpage/collection/relief These photographs give a very good
idea of what was happening in the Kharpert area in particular.
[12] From a
letter from Amy A. Burt to relatives back home in Oakland, California. To be found in the Gertrude A. Anthony
Papers at UC Berkeley in the Bancroft Library Archives (actually used by us in
2005 at a temporary site when Bancroft was being refurbished and made
earthquake-tolerant.) See Gertrude
Anthony Papers, 1906-1968 at BANC MSS 2002/207 cz Box 1 and Box 2.
[13]
Excerpted from a summary statement entitled ÒArmenian and Syrian ReliefÓ published
in The New Armenia vol. 9, no. 21
(1917) pgs. 332.
[14] We do
not make any attempt here to draw attention to, much less enumerate and
describe the heroic efforts made by Armenians in places in Russia outside of
the Caucasus such as Moscow and Petersburg. The Tiflis and Baku communities provided
relief as well of course. Certainly,
summary accounts exist but this is beyond the scope of this presentation.
[15] 1916 or
1917. Sixteen Striking Scenes: illustrating the suffering and need in Armenia
and other parts of Western Asia. American Committee for Armenian and Syrian
Relief. Consisting of 34
unnumbered pages. One page of description and others of reproduced photographs,
and one outline map in black and white.
The WorldCat cataloging also states that the entry includes portraits
[sic! but for us there are no portraits.
We would argue that close-up photos of children do not qualify as ÒportraitsÓ!]
22 cm. New York City: American Committee
for Relief in the Near East. This is a rare document.
[16] As an
example, a Greek fellow, whose ancestry included Greeks from the Pontos area,
was an incredible internet ÔbuddyÕ to ADK.
He had a wonderful Kurdish wife.
Both were interested in all of the Ottoman Genocides - Greek, Armenian,
Assyrian. He made himself sick with
his Ottoman Greek genocide studies and felt that he had to withdraw from work
and email communications. He stated
that he had to get away from it all.
Attempts to locate him in England have so far failed. This is mentioned to underscore that
studies on the visual aspects of all this can be, and often are,
overwhelming. He has been sorely
missed by us. His selflessness was
exemplary. Disappointingly, there
remain many who are reticent to share and some who are very ÒterritorialÓ. One will be aware of those who even go
so far as to place copyright notices on images they mistakenly claim to
own. Most seem not to know that
many replicates of photographs often exist in various collections, and
frequently in better condition than the one(s) nominally ÔcopyrightedÕ. Our
late friend from Singapore, Professor A.N. Rao, used to describe such people as
being among those who Òjealously guard their ignorance.Ó
APPENDIX
Redistribution of Groong articles,
such as this one, to any other media, including but not limited to other
mailing lists and Usenet bulletin boards, is strictly prohibited without
prior written consent from Groong's Administrator. |
| Home | Administrative | Introduction | Armenian News | World News | Feedback |