Armenian News Network / Groong
United States Consul Leslie A. DavisÕs Photographs of
Armenians Slaughtered at Lake Goeljuk, Summer of 1915
[A Groong posting here of a paper originally published in a Festschrift
volume in honor of German Journalist and Scholar Wolfgang Gust on the Occasion
of his 80th Birthday, 2015.
The celebratory volume Festschrift
Wolfgang zum 80. Geburtstag printed by Verlag Dinges & Frick, Wiesbaden
was edited by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach and is presented here with her kind
permission in the hope that it will give our contribution wider distribution
and broader coverage.]
Armenian News Network / Groong
April 7, 2017
Special to Groong by Abraham D. Krikorian and Eugene L.
Taylor
Long Island, NY
ãWas
hat der Mensch dem Menschen Gršsseres
zu geben als Wahrheit?Ó
ÒWhat does man have to give man
greater than truth?Ó Friedrich
Schiller (1759-1805)
Especially
appropriate epigraph quoted from this ultimate Renaissance manÕs writings which
was selected for use on the cover of the Wolfgang Gust Festschrift volume
United States Consul Leslie A.
DavisÕs Photographs of Armenians Slaughtered at Lake Goeljuk, Summer of 1915
ÒThe story of the deportation of the Armenians of Harput
is one of Ôperfidy, violence and murder.
It is nearer to the truth to say the Turkish government undertook the
extinction of the Armenian populationÓ – Words of missionary Rev. H.H. Riggs at the
mid-September meeting of the committee on ÒArmenian AtrocitiesÓ in New York
City soon after his return to America from Turkey in the summer of 1917.[1]
ÒMamuret-ul-Aziz has become the cemetery of the
Armenians.Ó[2]
Introduction
First of
all, we wish to participate in a small way in the honoring and recognition of
the major role that Wolfgang Gust has played through his work as a journalist
and editor of documentation sensu lato relating to the Turkish genocide against the
Armenians. His massive, seminal
works covering Pastor Johannes Lepsius and the rigorous documentation of
primary records originating from the German Foreign Office Archives [Dokumente aus dem
Politischen Archiv des deutschen AuswŠrtigen Amts] have been an inspiration to many, including those
from far outside the usual sphere of influence expected. We have been among them. His published work on the Armin Wegner
photographs likewise must be viewed as a model to be emulated. We are retired scientists who have
become much interested in carrying out work of attestation and attribution of
photographs and imagery relevant to what has come to be called the Armenian
Genocide.
The
vast majority of the American public, indeed the public everywhere,
increasingly obtains information through images. Virtually any and all kinds of mass
communication, news reporting, social media discourse and the like are
intimately linked with imagery – on-the-scene reporting, real time
electronic dissemination, sound bites, data banks and archives of digital and
film footage and photographs play a huge role. Indeed, today, both general and more
targeted mass media communications about the Armenian Genocide are no exception.[3]
On
November 1, 1916 U. S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing communicated by
telegram that
ÒReports for many months past from
official and other reliable sources show that the systematic deportation of the
Armenian population of Turkey continues; that their terrible sufferings at the
hands of the Turkish authorities are unmitigated; that thousands have died as a
result of cruelties, massacres, and starvation; and that it would appear that
these awful conditions are the result of a studied intention on the part of the
Ottoman Government to annihilate a Christian race. The true facts, if publicly known, would shock the whole
civilized world.Ó[4] [Emphasis added]
Rev. Henry Harrison Riggs was one of many reliable sources
referred to. He was born in Turkey
of missionary parents and had served since 1903 in Harput, located in the
Vilayet or Province of Mamouret-ul-Aziz in eastern Asia Minor, an area about as
a large as the states of Massachusetts and Connecticut combined.[5] His reports
on the fate of the Armenians in that region were widely reported, and we have
used a few of his words as an epigraph at the outset of this essay.[6]
Everyone undoubtedly understood when they saw newspaper
articles with headings like Butchery of
Armenians. Women and children killed in cold blood by Turks. Ten thousand
bodies counted in one small territory – a tale of horror not surpassed in
history.Ó[7] We can only guess how many
Americans knew that ÒperfidyÓ meant ÒdeceitfulnessÓ or ÒtreacheryÓ - all
certainly understood what Rev. Riggs meant by
ÒviolenceÓ and ÒmurderÓ. None of
this was in any way, shape or form controversial or complex.
Rev. Riggs went on to say
ÒAbout fifteen miles from Harput is a lake hidden from sight
with many ravines about it [Lake Goeljuk –
today Hazar GšlŸ]. We were told that the Armenian exiles
were being killed and left in these ravines. Two Americans investigated and brought
back photographs and actual facts.
They saw in a twenty mile ride 10,000 human bodies, most of them killed
by bayonet. With a few exceptions
they were women and children and the mangled condition of their bodies showed
the horrible fate that had been theirs.Ó
The two Americans they were referring to were United States
Consul Leslie A. Davis and Dr. Herbert Atkinson, who was the physician in
charge at the American Hospital in Mezereh, the provincial capital and lower
city counterpart town of Harput city.
WeÕll also see that one of the U.S. Consular attendants/guards, Cavass
Garabed Bedrosian, witnessed the scenes of horror as well.
Our Objective
We assert
that had the photographs Consul Davis had taken around Lake Goeljuk showing
slaughter of civilians been accessible to the European and American press, the
nonsense proffered and circulated by the Turkish government might well have
been put on a very different plane or even stopped. We will develop the argument that if
on-the-scene photographs of mass murder and crimes against humanity had been
made available to the press and responsible and respected neutrals at the outset
of the infamous "deportations", the impact would have been
substantial, even pivotal in generating an uproar and even possibly bringing
about the cessation of the ongoing crime.
In the least, one of the pretenses that persists to this very day could
have been nipped in the bud: this was the Young Turk leadershipÕs statement
that Òrelocating the Armenians to new homes outside the war zones was an
absolute necessity.Ó
(Incidentally, the very first official Turkish denial and
rejection in the United States of the carefully compiled Report of the American
Committee on Armenian Atrocities, which was released to the press on October 4, 1915, asserted that it was all a
Òfabrication.Ó)[8]
Some Early ÔHistoryÕ of the Davis
Photographs
Amateur
camera shots were indeed taken by a hand-held camera[9] and films, or what are
nowadays called ÔnegativesÕ were developed, printed, and shown to responsible
individuals on the scene in Harput/Mezereh by the man who took them – the
4th and very last United States Consul at Harput,
Leslie Ammerton Davis. These photographs remained virtually
unknown for many years to modern researchers of the Armenian Genocide, as will
be detailed below. Consul Davis
made the deliberate decision to retain the photographs at the Consulate because
it did not seem ÒprudentÓ to try to get them and a full report to Henry
Morgenthau, the American Ambassador to the Sublime Porte in
Constantinople. Unlike the
photographs, the dispatches from Consul Davis (and indeed other U.S. Consuls as
well) to Constantinople, and DavisÕs final report dated February 9, 1918 are
now widely available, and need not be of great concern here so far as precise
citation is concerned.[10]
The
first mention of the photographs appeared in cipher code that Consul Davis
added to the end of his message to Ambassador Morgenthau on December 30, 1915:
ÒI intend to
supplement these reports on the deportation and massacre of the Armenians with
an account of two trips which now made to a lake
about 5 hours distant? [sic] from here where I saw the dead bodies of fully 10
thousand persons comma many of whom had been recently killed comma and to
illustrate it with photographs which I took of them alive in camps Period It
would not be prudent to send such a report now PeriodÓ[11]
This
turns out in our judgment to be the first strategic mistake made concerning the
damning photos and specifics associated with them.
Context of the Davis
Photographs
To place
some of the photographs mentioned by Consul Davis in context, we provide a few
excerpts from his communications and writings which went into his report.[12] Indeed
nothing from Leslie A. Davis is ever really taken out of context since his
entire corpus of dispatches and writings concentrate in large part on the willful extermination of the Armenian people.
ÒThere were also hundreds of children arriving all the time
from other places, whose parents had died or been killed on the wayÉThen the
children disappeared and it was reported that they had all been taken to a lake
about twenty miles from Harput and drowned.Ó[p. 41]
ÒIt was rumored that many of the people who were brought here
had been pushed over the cliffs by the gendarmes and killed in that way. The rumor was fully confirmed by what we
saw. In some of the valleys there
were only a few bodies, but in others there were more than a thousand. One of the first corpses that we saw was
that of an old man with a white beard, whose skull had been crushed in by a
large stone which still remained in it.Ó[p. 66]
ÒI was subsequently informed more in detail about the system
employed in disposing of these parties of Armenians. They were allowed to camp for a day or
two in the valleys or in some convenient place. While they were there the gendarmes
summoned the Kurds É and ordered them to kill the Armenians, telling the Kurds
they could make money in this way but would have trouble if they refused.Ó[p.
68-69]
ÒA remarkable thing about the bodies that we saw was that
nearly all of them were naked. I
have been informed that the people were forced to take off their clothes before
they were killed as the Mohammedans consider clothes taken from a dead body to
be defiled. There were gaping
bayonet wounds on most of the bodies, usually in the abdomen or chest,
sometimes in the throat. Few
persons had been shot, as bullets were too precious. It was cheaper to kill
them with bayonets and knives.
Another remarkable thing was that nearly all the women lay flat on their
backs and showed signs of barbarous mutilation
by the bayonets of the gendarmes. These
wounds having been inflicted in many cases after the women were dead. We also noticed that all the bodies in
these valleys were apparently those of people who had been on the road at least
one or two months, showing that they were not from Harput but were from distant
places.Ó [p. 69]
We estimated that in the course of our ride around the lake,
and actually within the space of twenty-four hours, we had seen the remains of
not less than ten thousand Armenians who had been killed around Lake
GoeljukÉÓ[p. 75]
ÒThat which took place around beautiful Lake Goeljuk in the
summer of 1915 is almost inconceivable.
Thousands and thousands of Armenians, mostly innocent and helpless women
and children, were butchered on its shores and barbarously mutilated. It is hard for one living in a civilized
country to believe that such things are possible yet as Lord Bryce has said: "Things
which we find scarcely credible excite little surprise in Turkey.Ó [p. 76]
ÒThere were fully 150,000 Armenians in the Vilayet prior to
1915; at the end of that year, although there were more than we had supposed,
there remained only 8,000 or 10,000, as nearly as I can estimate it now, with
the addition of 1,000 or 2,000 deportees who had come there from other
vilayets.Ó [p. 88]
Consul Davis made a special effort to
protect unrestricted access to his typewritten
Report. He says in his cover letter[13]:
ÒI may at some future time, if the Department has no
objection, wish to use this report, in whole or in part, for literary purposes
and, therefore, respectfully request the Department to kindly not permit it to
be copied by any one who may be interested in obtaining material for
publication. In addition to what is
given in the report, I have at Harput
some other material, such as autobiographic sketches of a number of the persons
mentioned therein, as well as a large collection of photographs which I took while
there and which illustrate many of the scenes described. It was impossible, of course, to bring
any of them with me.Ó [Emphasis added]
No
risks, calculated or otherwise, were taken to get the photographic material out
of Turkey when Mr. Davis was recalled by the United States Government in 1917
after Turkey severed diplomatic relations with the United States.[14] The Turkish Government selected the route
by which Consul Davis should leave Harput.
It was about 500 miles from the nearest railroad and the journey was
made on horseback.
ÒIn the party with Mr. Davis were nine missionaries, four of
them women, whom he took out of the city.
They were escorted on the journey by four soldiers, the Turkish
authorities explaining that the soldiers would act as a guard. Wagons carried their food and bedding,
and as they passed no hotels on the route the party was obliged to cook their
own meals and sleep in the open. It
took them eighteen days to reach the railroad, and a three day journey to reach
Constantinople.Ó[15]
It may be that Davis did not consider the photographic
evidence crucial just then for communicating what was happening, and believed
that they would ÔeventuallyÕ be seen.
Or, as we believe, it was a regrettable, albeit conscious, decision by Davis,
made for other reasons. It did not
appear that he had grounds to fear for the safety of the materials during his
departure. After all, Consul Davis
expressed more than once that he and the Vali or Governor-General Sabit of Mamuret-ul-Aziz were on good terms. He had been given official documents to
present along the way and thus was assured of safe, even preferential escort
when they left Mezereh. Davis made
clear that they were put on a path which was chosen to prevent observation of
anything of a sensitive nature.
Although the group of travelers that he headed were closely supervised
along the way and even much-delayed in their final exit journey, no one
searched them. Hindsight tells us
many things, but here it also shows us that Consul Davis miscalculated when he
decided not to take the photographs out of what he and others on the scene
called Òthe Slaughterhouse ProvinceÓ when he left the Consulate in Mezereh
for good on May 16, 1917.[16] American officialdom was hurriedly
shepherded out, and American missionaries had been advised by the Embassy to
leave as well. Some stayed behind,
however, and to their enormous credit rendered what aid they could. Maria Jacobsen, a Danish missionary
nurse, is arguably the best known of these and she showed enormous bravery,
ingenuity and resourcefulness under virtually impossible conditions.[17]
By the time these photographs that could "horrify and
indict"[18] were eventually gotten out of Turkey, over four years of
horrible genocidal crimes had occurred. And to be perfectly clear, no one today
can be absolutely certain of the exact details – the trail of events relating to the photographs is spotty. Because they were left behind, their
very history soon became very much
muddied. It was only after the war that they
were recovered from Turkey by one Dr. Laurence H. MacDaniels and taken to the
United States. According to varying
reports, they were delivered to the State Department, and some copies were later
given to Cornell University while others remained with the family of
MacDaniels. From there the saga
becomes more complicated, as detailed below.
One important factor regarded whether the United States would
have wanted to use the photographs to repudiate publicly the widely disseminated
Turkish claims of simple relocation by deportation. No doubt Consul DavisÕs photographs
could have played a significant role in honest reporting, but more than likely
their use could not have been sanctioned by Official Washington since President
Wilson was determined not to declare war on Turkey and Bulgaria.[19]
Within a month of getting back home from duty at Harput on 28
August 1917, Consul Davis participated in a meeting in New York City aimed at
assessing the situation in Turkey and the needs of the remnant stricken
communities. The sole direct
outcome of his participation in that meeting that we have been able to trace is
that he wrote a letter of endorsement for those seeking funds for administering
relief. The statement of
endorsement first appeared in a 48 page booklet entitled Armenia, The Word Spells Tragedy that was published on 3 October
1917.[20]
But because of the apparent limitations put on him by the State
Department, his public utterances were very
circumspect as to any specific details that only he as an official employee of
the diplomatic service had lived through and was privy to. Despite his being in a position to be so
specific about it all, it is noteworthy that he avoided mentioning anything in
public about the violence and massacres perpetrated.
Indeed, in a letter dated 30 November 1917 addressed to the
Secretary of State Consul Davis pointed out that he had been requested several
times to speak for the cause of Armenian and Syrian Relief.
ÒI referred the Committee to the Department and understand
that the answer received has not been favorable, but think that may have been
due to an incorrect statement made by the Committee about the subject on which
it wished me to speak. I should, of course, confine myself strictly to the
needs of the Armenians in Turkey, avoiding
all reference to anything of a political nature and saying nothing about the
atrocities that have been committed. [Emphasis added] In fact, I should try to follow the
lines along which Ambassadors Morgenthau and Elkus are now speaking for this
Committee. If the Department has no
objection, I shall be glad to assist to some extent in this work, especially at
this season of the year when the need is so great, as I naturally feel much
interested in it after my experience in helping these unfortunate people while
I was in Harput and as I am so keenly aware of their present wretched
condition.Ó[21]
In brief, once out of the Ottoman Empire, and so far as the
general public at large was concerned, Leslie Davis concentrated on the great
need of the Armenian survivors. He
took up the task of seeking out Armenians who had relatives in the Harput
Consular district. We have no
written record of how he approached the situation at each of the places he
visited but there are a number of letters of thanks on file.[22]
The language that Consul Davis necessarily used in his single
public endorsement of efforts to raise relief funds primarily among
non-Armenians can be judged as circumspect, even awkward, and certainly not
very specific. For example, in the
1917 booklet Armenia, the Word Spells
Tragedy and in the 1918 version we read:-
"I believe there is no place in the world where there is
greater and more urgent need of relief at the present time than among the
surviving Christian population in the
Turkish Empire. [Emphasis added]
ÒI speak from a personal knowledge of
the situation as during the past three years I have been located at Harput, and
there was brought into close contact with the distress and misery of thousands of homeless and destitute women
and children who are absolutely dependent upon charity for their subsistence.
[Emphasis added]
ÒFor the past two years [1915-1917]
systematic relief has been regularly given by the American missionaries and
myself to more than 5,000 Armenians in the vicinity of Harput alone. Notwithstanding our efforts, it was
impossible to reach all and many hundreds were constantly being turned away
owing to insufficient funds, while in scarcely any instance was the relief
given adequate for their needs. All
that anyone ever received was one small piece of bread a day, and in many cases
this had to be shared with others.
It is to be borne in mind that very few of these people have any way of
earning, as owing to the existing conditions there is no work to be obtained.
ÒThe majority of these unfortunate
women and children are now in such a wretched and helpless condition that they
cannot long survive if help is not received. In fact, many did die last winter for
lack of food. Present conditions
are more critical than ever.
ÒArrangements have been made by which
funds can continue to be sent there without any risk of loss, and it can be
done in this difficult interior district, there can be little doubt about
reaching all other parts of Turkey where relief is being distributed.Ó [details
at 20]
Consul
DavisÕs use of the expression Òsurviving Christian populationÓ raises the
obvious question as to exactly what had they ÒsurvivedÓ? Precisely what was the origin of the
Òdistress and misery?Ó Was none of
that worth at least some semblance of a gentle reminder? We conclude from such statements and a
wide array of other available facts that it had been decided that official
representatives of the United States would concentrate on relief measures and
refrain from any open condemnation of Òthe Turks.Ó In short, the decision was made well
before President Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war against
Germany.
It was only in 1923 that the horror scenes at Lake Goeljuk
and vicinity surfaced again in an official capacity. In a letter from former
Harput Cavass Garabed Bedrosian dated July 25, 1923 addressed to the Honorable
Wilbur J. Carr, Director of the Consular Service, State Department, Washington,
D.C. we read:
ÒSir: ÉI take liberty of the occasion to give some facts of
the activities of Consul Davis. In
July 1915, the most tragic historical period of our race, there happened to be
a considerable number of Naturalized American citizens of Armenian origin in
the State of Mamouret-ul-Aziz.
Every Armenian was ordered to go to an unknown destination. Consul Davis wrote a formal protest to
the Turkish authorities for the exemption of the American citizens from
deportation and asked them to give such citizens a safe conduct to leave the
country. The Governor answered him
saying that the citizens must first go to exile and thence they could go to
America if they chose. So Consul
Davis was unable to do anything officially. After a few days we were informed that
the people who were deported were being killed within a few miles from the
city. Consul Davis would hardly
believe this so he and I went out on horseback from the town and when we were
away about three miles, on both sides of the main road the dead bodies could be
seen. When we made fifteen miles we
saw thousands of bodies of men women and children killed and decayed. Consul Davis was then convinced that the
Governor meant to root out the Armenian race from his state, so he began to do
the utmost to extend protection to the existing citizens.Ó[23]
The Elusive Davis
Photographs
The exact
number of photographs taken at the scenes of brutal murder in the area round
Lake Goeljuk is today unknowable. What happened to the photographs, at least
some of them, after they were out of Turkey is yet another story or two - each
fraught with its own uncertainties and difficulties. We believe that more photos were taken
than those that were Ôre-discoveredÕ in 1984 by Susan K. Blair at the MacDanielses residence in Ithaca, New York April 18 and
19[24] and which were reproduced in distressingly poor quality in her book of
1989.[25] It is worth emphasizing
here as well that it was not only a matter of photographs relating to DavisÕ
dispatches and Final Report being or becoming irretrievable or "lost,"
but it is also a fact that the Davis Final typewritten report itself somehow
ended up being misfiled or otherwise submerged at the United States National
Archives. This was at the time there was only the downtown Washington, DC
facility. It was there that the
Report was eventually chanced upon by Susan Blair while doing related work, and
was "re-discovered" as well.[26] (The enormous, modern ÒUS National
Archives IIÓ facility at College Park, Maryland, was not opened for research
until the summer of 1994.)
The first batch gotten out was by Dr. Laurence H. and his
wife, Frances C. MacDaniels, an American couple
who served at Harput with the American Committee for Relief in the Near East
(ACRNE). The MacDanielses
were among those who left New York February 1919 on the S.S. Leviathan to serve
with ACRNE. The two spent the early
part of their service at Derindje on the Sea of
Marmora, and only later at Harput.[27] Former Harput Consulate Cavass Garabed
Bedrosian handed over some photographs around that time to Dr. Laurence H.
MacDaniels, whom he had worked with while serving for the ACRNE. (Probably at
the time of their leaving.) Taking
the photographs with them on departure from Turkey in the spring of 1920 was
easy enough since Turkey had been defeated in the war and presented no
difficulties.
The sequel to the story after the pictures were taken out of
Turkey is considerably less straightforward.[28] For convenience we refer to these
ÔrediscoveredÕ photographs, as the MacDaniels
Davis photos.
The MacDaniels Davis
photos were said to have been sent by L. H.
MacDaniels to the United States State Department (fide their sole surviving child, a daughter, Mrs. Ellen M.
Speers). Exactly when this was done
is not known. Upon return to
America he assumed duties as a professor in the Department of Pomology at
Cornell University, as reported to us by his daughter, and as verified in the
Cornell Archives. The photographic
materials sent by Dr. MacDaniels have never been found either at the United
States National Archives or elsewhere. (We use the word ÔmaterialsÕ advisedly
since it is not known whether prints, or
negatives or both were sent. If we
were to hazard an educated guess, only prints.)
Although no written record of transmittal of the photos by
MacDaniels has been found, it is apparent that he either prepared himself or had glass lantern slides made of several of the
Davis photographs for use in talks.
The quality is poor, a result of storage under terrible conditions in
Turkey, and the subsequent digital scans made for us some years ago from the
slides reflect this. Poor quality
as they are, they are, let it be emphasized, the only ones that are available
at present for full scholarly access and study. These glass lantern slides are now at
the Cornell University Archives, but a couple of images are also in MacDaniels
family hands. None are in the hands
of the Davis family, i.e. fide his
late son Caleb Davis and his wife, Leslie DavisÕ daughter-in-law Barbara Hale
Davis, and personal knowledge since we scanned such photographs as were
available at their home.
Author Susan K. Blair nominally borrowed some of the
photographs from the MacDaniels family, but has not returned them. As personally communicated to one of us
(ADK), she retains them and there is no evidence that she will share them with
anyone, much less deposit them any time soon in a place where we would maintain
they rightfully belong, namely the United States Archives in College Park. This again, we would suggest, as things
stand now, once more put the Davis photographs at risk of being lost to
unrestricted use and study.[29]
The publication trail of the MacDaniels Davis photos is incomplete. Publisher Aristide Caratzas has
communicated that some of the photographs used in the publication of The Slaughterhouse
Province were lost by the Printer.[30] Although he possesses some MacDaniels Davis photos and has promised
to make them available to us for study, this has so far not materialized. Mr. Caratzas also has other photographs
taken by Leslie Davis that were taken from the collection of son Caleb Davis
when he was alive. Attempts by the
Davis family to recover those photographs were unsuccessful.[31]
In view of all the above, we are very much inclined to
designate the Davis genocide photographs as ill-fated, not only from the
beginning but at every subsequent step along the way.
The outcome has been that some of the "rediscovered"
photographs referred to by us as the MacDaniels
Davis photos, were presented to the reading and viewing public albeit in
rather poor reproduction and in small format in Susan K. BlairÕs cited book The Slaughterhouse Province. The story
of the photographs as given by Blair in her book is considerably
abbreviated. For instance, the role
of Elsie Kelly, who worked at Near East Foundation in New York City in the
Office of President Richard H. Nolte is not mentioned. Incidentally, David S. Dodge living in
Princeton, New Jersey was Chairman of the Board of NEF at the time. [32] Elsie Kelly,
and especially the Dodges were friends of Ellen MacDaniels Speers and her
husband Peter. Ellen Speers had
approached NEF by mail in the first instance for advice about finding an eventual
place for the deposition of her parentsÕ relief work in Turkey letters, papers
and photographs etc. This is
nowhere mentioned by Blair. In
fact, it was Elsie Kelly who made Susan Blair aware of the American Committee
for Relief in the Near East materials at the MacDanielsÕ home in Ithaca in the
first instance, after she had been contacted by Ellen Speers. One would think that the role played by
these two women, at least Mrs. Speers, deserved considerable credit.[33]
For all practical purposes, our unrealistic hopes and
attempts to learn much that is really new about the photographs have become an
exercise in futility. And, although
some might not like reading this, the true value and relevance of the photographs
have faded as much as the few existing "original" or "semi-original"
glossy prints.
The entire story represents to
us a consummate travesty. The
visual proof obtained on the spot by an American official from a neutral
country that never did declare war on Turkey is dramatic and unassailable. The Davis photographs directly
contradict the official "Turkish Point of View." Regrettably, although the consequences of the calculated slaughter of innocents were
documented on film, the photographs never played any role whatever in getting
the real story out. A few like Rev.
Riggs mentioned the photos in their talks but no one could show any photos
since they were ÒhiddenÓ in Mezereh, Turkey.
Today, those recovered, marginally rehabilitated photographs
that can be presented are not dramatic by modern
standards. More importantly, they
have long been either ignored, dismissed or
explained away by the ÒTurkish Point of ViewÓ as isolated, regrettable and very
atypical incidents perpetrated by unruly Òrural Muslim populations.Ó[34]
If one were to make a studied effort to appear measured, even
seek diligently to be Òfair and balancedÓ, and to understate deliberately the
matter, as some historians assert that one should, one could say that the
Leslie A. Davis photographs call into question any contention that the
Armenians were being ÒresettledÓ.
In an apparent response to Consul DavisÕs request that the ÒDepartment to kindly not permit [his
report] to be copiedÉÓ the specific text of the request was underlined in
pencil and the relevant part of the sentence noted marginally as well, and
stamped in the right hand margin Òconfidential.Ó Indeed, the cover letter, typed on
official American Consulate stationery is
stamped CONFIDENTIAL.
Consul Davis hoped that he could use the report for literary
purposes. His use of the word
ÒliteraryÓ seems odd to us. The
closest intent that we can come up with is that he hoped to produce a Òfinely
crafted narrativeÓ. That would have been interesting indeed since it would have
been the first detailed narrative of the events in the Harput
area as the genocide unfolded. But
he did not do this because, according to his correspondence with Garabed
Bedrosian, he seems never to have gotten all his photographs.[refer
to Endnote 23]
Let it again be emphasized that Consul DavisÕ Final Report
was submitted to Washington on February 9, 1918 and as it turned out, the
Armistice of Mudros that would end hostilities
between Turkey and the Allies on October 31 at noon was signed on October 30,
1918. By the time the report had
been filed it was too late for anyone to do anything, even had they wanted to
do so.
What Davis, and indeed others, witnessed and communicated to
the American Embassy in Constantinople and from there to America is nowadays
available to anyone who wants to read it.
At the time Davis sent his official "despatches",
very few outsiders were privileged to know what was really going on. There was, for all intents and purposes,
a news blackout.[35]
Photographs In A Print-Oriented
Discipline
Photographs have never been a high priority with historians,
or social scientists for that matter. They have rarely been viewed as evidence.
This is changing we believe. They need to be attested and attributed
if they are to be of optimal use.
Some earnest efforts by interested parties may refine many of the
details of photographs that we, ourselves, portray as ÒWitnesses to Massacres
and Genocide and their Aftermath.Ó
But not surprisingly, the conclusions remain the same — there was
a genocide. Compared to the Nazi
Holocaust, studies of the Armenian genocide and any photographs connected with
it are somewhat rudimentary but they are by no means inconsequential.[36] The
photographs taken by Leslie A. Davis are very significant since he took them,
and placed them in full written context.
It
is unfortunate that the history of the photographs has remained far less
well-known than desired. The
oft-used expression ÔCataract of the TimesÕ may arguably be used in connection
with the photographs in modified form to read ÔThe cataract of time blurs the
details that were once so vivid.Õ [37] The penultimate paragraph in
Consul DavisÕ report of February 1918 reads:-
ÒIt appears from the foregoing report that during the past
three years the greater part of my work has been for Armenians. This report, however, is not intended to
be a brief for their cause, whatever the merits of that may be. I was so placed that I happened to be a
witness of the terrible treatment they received at the hands of the Turkish
Government and naturally did what I could to relieve their suffering. I kept on friendly terms with the
officials and found some of them very agreeable, but I trust the Turkish
Government will never again have the opportunity to persecute the Armenians or
any other of its subject races. I
was able to help comparatively few, of course, in the wholesale destruction of life that took place while I was there
[Emphasis added] and, although I helped all whom I could, there were cases
where it was not possible to do anything; yet it is somewhat remarkable that
none of the Armenians whom I have met here have spoken a word of complaint, no
matter what the news for them might have been.Ó
Eghadzuh eghereh
The stoic refrain of many Kharpert Armenians who
survived the genocide "What has happened has happened." (personal
recollection of ADK)
Fig. 1. Reproduction of the dust
jacket of The Slaughterhouse Province.
Permission of Aristide D. Caratzas.
Fig. 2. View of the recreational area used by Missionaries
and American Consular officials at Lake Goeljuk.
Photograph from the
summer of 1913 given us by the late Mary Masterson, daughter of the penultimate
U.S. Consul to Harput,
William W. Masterson. The trees are mulberry trees which
provide edible fruit. Mulberry
leaves are used as food for silkworms.
Fig. 3. Photograph by Leslie Davis of bodies at Lake Goeljuk. The one closest to the viewer with outstretched
arm is clearly a female.
Courtesy of Cornell University Archives, Professor Laurence Howland
MacDaniels. Papers 1915-1986.
#21/25/815. Box 41.
Fig. 4.
Photograph by Leslie Davis of body at Lake Goeljuk. Courtesy of Cornell University Archives,
Professor Laurence Howland MacDaniels. Papers 1915-1986. #21/25/815. Box 41.
Fig. 5.
Photograph by Leslie Davis of bodies at Lake Goeljuk. Courtesy of Cornell University Archives,
Professor Laurence Howland MacDaniels. Papers 1915-1986. #21/25/815. Box 41.
Note the trees on the
horizon at the right hand side.
This photograph was
apparently taken from a side of the Lake distant to the view in Figs. 2 and 3.
Fig. 6. Photograph by
Leslie Davis of bodies in one of the ravines at Lake Goeljuk.
Courtesy of Cornell
University Archives,
Professor Laurence
Howland MacDaniels. Papers 1915-1986.
#21/25/815. Box 41.
Fig. 7. . Photograph by
Leslie Davis of open grave in one of the ravines at Lake Goeljuk.
Courtesy of Mrs. Ellen
MacDaniels Speers. also
Cornell University
Archives, Professor Laurence Howland MacDaniels. Papers 1915-1986. #21/25/815. Box 41.
Acknowledgements
We thank
Cornell University Archives for permission to use some of the scans presented
here, as well as Mrs. Ellen MacDaniels Speers for her ongoing encouragement and
help with access to her parentsÕ materials both at Oberlin College and those
materials or copies that she retained for family archives. We thank Aristide D. Caratzas for
permission to reproduce the dust jacket of The Slaughterhouse Province. We also thank the Hagley Museum and
Library, Wilmington, Delaware, and the Armenian Research Center, University of
Michigan, Dearborn, especially Gerald E. Ottenbreit
Jr., for access to various Bedrosian and Davis documents and letters. Many thanks to Caleb W. Davis (now
deceased), his wife Barbara Hale Davis and daughter Carla Davis for their
kindness and help. Last, but by no
means least, we thank our friend Peter Muir for his help in improving the
images.
Endnotes
[1] See for example The St. Johnsbury Caledonian (St. Johnsbury,
Vermont October 18, 1917; The Cornell
Daily Sun (Ithaca) October 18, 1917.
See Chronicling America, Library of Congress
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov.
[2] Quoted in Ambassador Henry MorgenthauÕs ÒThe Greatest Horror in
History.Ó Red Cross Magazine March
1918, p. 12. This statement is
attributable to Swedish missionary Alma Johansson working in the German
orphanage at Moush. Reference to Harput being the cemetery
of the Armenians may also be found in ÒLord BryceÕs Report on the Turkish
Atrocities in ArmeniaÓ Current History
5 (November) 1916 p. 327 ff.
[3] See the writings of Dr. Leshu Torchin ÒSince we forgot: remembrance
and recognition of the Armenian genocide in virtual archivesÓ in (F. Guerin and
R. Hallas, eds.) The Image and the
Witness: trauma, memory and visual culture, (New York and London:
Wallflower Press 2007, pp. 82-97; idem Creating
Witness: documenting genocide on film, video, and the Internet
(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2012.
[4] See
Foreign Relations, 1916, Supplement, p. 858 File No. 867.4016/299, Foreign
Relations of the United States digital collections from the University of
Wisconsin http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/collections/FRUS
[5] For a
range of details on Armenian Kharpert
see R. G. Hovannisian (ed.) Armenian Tsopk/Kharpert, Costa Mesa, CA.: Mazda Publishers
2002.
[6] See H.H. Riggs Days of
Tragedy in Armenia: personal experiences in Harput, 1915-1917, Ann Arbor:
Gomidas Institute 1997.
[7] The Watchman and Southron (Sumter, SC Oct. 20) p. 8, see Chronicling America,
Library of Congress http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov.
[8] A.D. Krikorian and E.L.Taylor (October
4, 2014) Ò99 Years Ago Today:- Who Knew What, When and How about ÒThe Massacres
that Would Change the Meaning of ÔMassacreÕ: The Committee on Armenian Atrocities in New York CityÕs Release for
Publication in Papers of Monday, Oct. 4, 1915Ó, at Groong, Armenian News
Network http://www.groong.org/orig/ak-20141004.html; also for a considerably broader
perspective see Fatma M. Gšcek Denial
of Violence. Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence against the
Armenians 1789-2009, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press 2015. It is also noteworthy that the German
Ambassador to the United States Count von Bernstorff, declared the alleged
atrocities in the Ottoman Empire were Òpure inventions.Ó See New York Times 28
September 1915 p. 2.
[9] Personal
communication, the late Caleb Davis, Consul Leslie Ammerton
DavisÕs son.
[10] Consul DavisÕ Final Report was
submitted to Washington on February 9, 1918 and the Armistice of Mudros that would end hostilities between Turkey and the
Allies on October 31 at noon was signed on October 30, 1918. See Report
of Leslie A. Davis, American Consul formerly at Harput, Turkey, on the work of
the American Consulate at Harput since the Beginning of the Present War. This Report is prepared at the request
of Mr. Wilbur J. Carr, Director of the Consular Service. Filed Oct 25 1920.
United States National Archives, Index Bureau 867.4016/392; A. Hairapetian
ÒÕRace ProblemsÕ and the Armenian Genocide: The State Department file.Ó The Armenian Review 37, 1984, pp. 41-59; Susan K. Blair (ed.), The Slaughterhouse
Province, an American DiplomatÕs Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1915-191, New
Rochelle, NY: Aristide D. Caratzas, Publisher 1989; Ara Sarafian United States Official Documents on the
Armenian Genocide, vol.2, (Watertown, MA: Armenian Review 1983); idem United States Official Records on the
Armenian Genocide 1915-1917, (Princeton and London: Gomidas Institute
2004). Online see http://www.gomidas.org/uploads/Index.pdf and the Foreign
Relations of the United States digital collections from the University of
Wisconsin http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/collections/FRUS. Carbon
copy filed in RG 59 Department of State Decimal File 1910-1929 123 D291/6 to
123D 2913/80A Box 1306.
[11] Leslie
A. Davis (1915) ÒI have the honor to continue my reports of June 30th,
July 11th, July 24th, August 23rd and
September 7th [File No. 840.1] about the deportation and massacre of
the Armenians in this regionÉÓ see United States
National Archives RG 59 867.4016/269. Papers associated with activities as
Consul at Harput, Turkey may be found at Davis, Leslie A. (1915). U.S.
Department of State, Record Group 59, International Affairs of Turkey,
1910-1929 (Microfilm Publications) Microcopy 353: 88 reels, especially 867.4016/1-1011,
reels 43-48. When we first began our studies on Leslie A. Davis we were allowed
access to the paper records in RG 59 Department of State Decimal File 1910-29
ÔFrom 123 D 291/6 to 123 D 2913/80A. Box 1306.Õ The condition of the documents
was such that we were allowed to make scans on a flat bed scanner. Obviously such access allowed color marks
etc. to show up rather than the black and white of microfilm.
[12] DavisÕs
original typewritten report of February 9, 1918. Page numbers in the following all refer
to this report.
[13] NA/RG59/867.4016/392 (Cover letter stamped Index
Bureau D291/62; stamped received by Consular Bureau Feb 13, 1918; stamped filed
March 11, 1918. Declassified 1/24/02).
[14] On
April 20, 1917 Turkey communicated that Òas the United States has declared
itself to be at war with Germany, the Ottoman GovernmentÕs ally, it found it
necessary to sever its diplomatic relations with the United States as from that
date.Ó See ÒLansing confirms break
with Turkey. Constantinople notified our embassy of its action on April 20.
Belligerent action likely. Washington expected to recognize Revolted Arabs and
British Protectorate of Egypt.Ó New York Times 24 April 1917 p. 3.
[15] See
e.g. Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Friday 31
August 1917 p.5.
[16] Susan K. BlairÕs edited book comprising the Final Report of Consul
Davis submitted in February 1918 draws
its title The Slaughterhouse Province, an
American DiplomatÕs Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1917 from the
designation given by Leslie A. Davis to his Consular district. The Report proper in that volume runs
from pp. 37-125. The Introduction
by Susan K. Blair runs from pp. 1-35.
There are 21 notes to the Introduction, pp. 127-131. Notes to the Report total 80 in number,
and run from pp.131 to 139. There
are more than a few errors: a few may be cited, in note 64 to the report Dr.
Ruth A. ParmeleeÕs surname is misspelled Parmalee; in
note 66, what Blair gives as Viscount James Bryce of Fallodan,
is in the first instance erroneously described as Earl of Fallodan. In either case Fallodan
should have been spelled Fallodon. James Bryce finally agreed to be raised
to Viscount Bryce of Dechmont on 28 January
1914. Blair has confused Lord Bryce
with Viscount Grey of Fallodon to whom the well-known
British Blue Book Treatment of the
Armenians was submitted. Also,
an omission from DavisÕ original report was made, presumably inadvertently. In any case, despite its shortcomings,
the least of which have been cited, it was, and still is an important work
because it was the first to make available his witnessing much of the
systematic destruction either firsthand or through trusted informants. See Ara Sarafian in his review of
BlairÕs book entitled ÒThe Slaughterhouse
Province: An American Diplomat's Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1917 - Leslie A. Davis, edited by Susan
K. Blair. New Rochelle, N.Y.: Aristide D. Caratzas, 1989, 216 pp." in
The Armenian Review 42, 1989, pp.83-86. A significant point about Consul
DavisÕs Report prior to its being rediscovered by Blair, is that hardly any
scholar seems to have paid attention to it in their research and professional
writings. Professor Robert L.
Daniel mentions it in a footnote. R.L. Daniel ÔThe Armenian Question and
American-Turkish relations, 1914-1927" The
Mississippi Valley Historical Review 46, 1959, pp. 252-275 footnote 2
p.253. It is significant that
Armenian genocide denier Esat Uras ÒThe Armenians in History and the Armenian
QuestionÓ 1988 and denier Salahi Sonyel completely ignore Leslie Davis, see
review of the former by Christopher Walker in Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Issue 1, 1990, pp.165-170 and again, a review by Christopher Walker of SonyelÕs
ÒThe Great War and the Tragedy of AnatoliaÓ in Asian Affairs (London) 32, 2001, pp. 314-315.
[17] Maria Jacobsen Oragrut`iwn,
1907-1919: Kharberd [Diary, 1907-1919, Kharpert, in Armenian and Danish],
Armenian Catholicosate 1979: Antelias, Lebanon; Maria
Jacobsen ÒDiaries of a Danish Missionary: Harpoot 1907- 1919Ó. Gomidas
Institute Press, Princeton and London 2001.
[18] We borrow this phrase from Tessa Hofmann and Gerayer Koutcharian
ÒImages that horrify and indictÓ: pictorial documents on the persecution and
extermination of Armenians from 1877 to 1922Ó, The Armenian Review, 45, 1992, pp. 53-184.
[19] Why the
United States was adamant in not declaring war on Turkey or Bulgaria cannot be
dealt with here. For the role of
Cleveland Dodge in advocating AmericaÕs distance on that point see ÒThe
friendship of Woodrow Wilson and Cleveland H. Dodge.Ó Mid-America: an historical quarterly 43, 1961, pp.182-196. See also Stephen P.L. Penrose That They May Have Life, the Story of the
American University of Beirut, 1866-1941 New York Trustees of the American
University of Beirut 1941 especially pp. 162-163. On 2 April 1917 President Wilson went
before Congress asking for a declaration of war against Germany. On 6 April the Senate agreed and two days
later the House so did the House. War was declared on Austria-Hungary on 7
December 1917, but never on Turkey or Bulgaria. The consequences of this are still
enormous.
[20]
American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief Armenia, The Word Spells Tragedy New York: American Committee for
Armenian and Syrian Relief 1917.)
In a later printing, with no publication date but certainly no earlier
than very late 1918, and in a slightly different format and with an Index, as
well as a letter of appeal included from President Woodrow Wilson on White
House letterhead and dated 29 November 1918, we see in what is essentially the
same ÔhandbookÕ statements by several American Consuls etc. The same testimony written by Consul
Davis in 1917 is included without date. It is among the letters included under
the heading Testimony from United States Consular AgentsÓ - see the SpeakersÕ Handbook of American Committee for
Relief in the Near East. New York City: Headquarters One Madison Avenue, 48
pages, 1918. See esp. pp.
44-45. All the indications are that
this handbook emerged out a meeting held on Tuesday, January 22, 1918 at the
Foreign Missions Conference Rooms 19th floor 25 Madison Avenue, New
York. Leslie Davis was on the
morning program of the ÒConference of Armenian-Syrian Relief Committeemen and
Workers.Ó The First session,
starting at 10:00 a.m. was entitled ÒReports from the field and survey of
conditions and relief requirements in Asia Minor, Syria, The Caucasus, Persia,
Mesopotamia an[d] Palestine.Ó Dr.
William Wheelock Peet, and Consul Leslie A. Davis and
othersÓ were slated to make presentations. Accession 1174, Charles L. Huston papers,
Box 15, Hagley Museum and Library, Manuscripts and Archives Department,
Wilmington, Delaware.
[21] U.S.
National Archives 123D291/56 November 30, 1917 American Consul, Leslie A. Davis
formerly at Harput to The Secretary of State concerning invitations to take on
speaking engagements, and promise not to enter into discussions of a political
nature etc.
[22] Consul
Davis seems to have done this in a very effective way and by 30 November Consul
Davis was able to report to the Secretary of State that he had visited the
Òprinciple cities where there are Armenians with whom I have had correspondence
concerning their relatives in the Harput consular district and have given them
such information as I could about the persons in Turkey in whom they are
interested.Ó U.S. National Archives
123D291/57. There are many letters
of thanks in the files from Armenian community leaders pointing out
appreciatively the meetings he held with the communities, see e.g. U.S.
National Archives 123D291/57 Wilbur J. Carr to Davis 22 December 1917.
[23] The Garabed and Aghavnie
Bedrosian Collection of documents, correspondence, photographs, a diary and
other papers, ca. 1919-1964 are at Harvard University Archives, Cambridge,
Mass. A partial copy set of
correspondence is available at University of Michigan, Dearborn, Armenian
Research Center. We also own a
spiral bound copy of some of the relevant correspondence that was given us by
Leslie A. DavisÕs granddaughter Ms. Carla Davis, daughter of Leslie DavisÕs son
the late Caleb Davis and his wife Barbara Hale Davis. See also J.M. Hagopian ÒVoices from the
Lake: the secret genocideÓ in R.G. Hovanissian (ed.) Armenian Tsopk/Kharpert (Costa Mesa: Madzda Publishers 2002, and
J.M. Hagopian, G. Farr, C. Garapedian,
J. Bilezikjian Voices from the
Lake, the secret genocide, Thousand Oaks, Armenian Film Foundation 2000,
videodisc, 84 minutes; M. Jones, V. Price, P. Lindley, J. Perkins The Hidden Holocaust, the Armenian genocide,
1915 (London: Panoptic 1993 videodisc 50 minutes (first shown in 1990 on
Television on Jack PerkinsÕ Time Machine, A & E Home Video.)
[24] From original correspondence given us by Mrs. Ellen M. Speers,
permission granted for unrestricted use.
[25] Susan K. Blair, Op. cit.
Unfortunately the publication of this book based on Consul DavisÕs
presence at Harput as the genocide unfolded and was taking place evoked a
considerable Òdiplomatic stormÓ from Turkish diplomats in America. Physical threats of violence were heaped
upon both author and publisher by unknown protectors of Òthe Turkish point of
viewÓ in an unrelenting manner and for a very long time – so much so that
Ms. Blair felt obliged to go into hiding.
For some specifics of this sad episode in American publishing see Edwin
McDowell, ÒKilling ArmeniansÓ [Book notes], The
New York Times, Nov. 15, 1989, C26; Kate McKenna, ÒAccount of Armenian
Massacre provokes diplomatic storm,Ó The
New York Times, Long Island Weekly, Section 12, December 3, 1989, p. 1 and
pp.16-17; John Robinson, ÒAuthor defends book on Armenian killings,Ó Boston Globe, April 18, 1990, p. 4; Paul
Farhi, ÒHaunted by an old horror: a familyÕs ordeal. Shedding light on a 1915 Genocide has
forced a Virginia writer into the shadows,Ó The
Washington Post, Section F, Sunday, May 26, 1991, pp. 1 and 4.
[26] There are more than a few instances of what might be referred to
as selective misfiling of important documents. Over the years one document to which our
attention has been repeatedly drawn is mentioned in a statement relating to
America and the Palestine Question, cf. Selig Adler ÒThe Palestine Question in
the Wilson Era.Ó Jewish Social Studies 10,
1948, 303-334, at p. 308, Ò[Secretary of State ] Lansing had been warned to
keep it [a critical letter] in a safe place Ôso that future historians who may
be prowling around the archives of the State Department may not hit on it...Ó
[27] For a
perspective on the relief work of Laurence H. and Frances C. MacDaniels and
their photographs relating to their tenure in Turkey for ACRNE see the Oberlin
Archives Near East Relief Photo Album, 1919-1910
at http://www.oberlin.edu/archive/NearEast.html
and http://dcollections.oberlin.edu/cdm/search/collection/relief).
[28] The
photographs ÔrediscoveredÕ by Susan K. Blair at the MacDanielses
were in an envelope that was reproduced in Susan K. BlairÕs book in her
Appendix E. According to Mrs. Ellen
MacDaniels Speers, the envelope labelled ÒArmenian DeportationsÓ is in her
fatherÕs handwriting, and we certainly concur since we have worked with the
MacDaniels materials both at Cornell and Oberlin. The other writing is her own, Òwritten at
two different times – the writing on the lower part of the envelope is an
attempt to summarize the story as recounted perhaps in the sixties or
seventies.Ó
[29] The
expression territoriality is often used to characterize this perspective.
[30]
Telephone conversation with Aristide Caratzas when he was visiting Washington,
D.C. in February 2014.
[31] Personal
communication from Aristide Caratzas in February 2014 minus the fact that he
had expropriated the photos, and before that plus the fact that he expropriated
the photos, from Caleb Davis well before he died, 19 December 2003, and his
wife Barbara Hale Davis – now still alive and very alert.
[32] David
Stuart Dodge (1922- 2009) was a 4th generation member of the famous
Dodge family that served in the Middle East. See especially Stephen P.L. Penrose That They May Have Life, the Story of the
American University of Beirut, 1866-1941, New York Trustees of the American
University of Beirut 1941.
[33] In a
letter to Mrs. Speers dated 2 October 1984 David S. Dodge states ÒWe suggest
that you have your ParentsÕ documents sent to the Foundation in New York City. The
Foundation does not have archives, but we do feel it could study the documents
intelligently and have them deposited in an appropriate place. Princeton is a
possibility and Dick Nolte has other possibilities in mind too. We could have a better idea about where
they should be kept after seeing them. Susan
Blair is not connected with the Foundation, but I understand she is writing
about Near East Relief. The
Foundation people know her and could discuss the letters and photos with her.
She would probably like to see them too.Ó [Emphasis added] From original correspondence given us by
Mrs. Ellen M. Speers, permission granted for unrestricted use.
[34] As an example see Professor Andrew Mango ÒSpeaking Turkey.Ó Review
Article in Middle Eastern Studies 33,
1997, pp. 152-170, at p.159.
[35]
Although Consul Davis was unaware of it at the time, one of his dispatches to
Ambassador Morgenthau dated 11 July 1915 was included (albeit redacted to
eliminate date, authorship and location) in the first Report of the Committee
on Armenian Atrocities which consisted of 12 galleys. It announced massacres on
an extensive scale and the incredibly severe treatment of the Armenians (see Report of the Committee on Armenian
Atrocities: release to publication in papers of Monday, Oct. 4, 1915; also
as Rapport du ComitŽ
amŽricain de New-York sur les atrocitŽs commises en
ArmŽnie / trad. de lÕanglais, Paris: H. Durville, 1915) – see under section XXIV in A.D. Krikorian and E.L.Taylor (October
4, 2014) Ò99 Years Ago Today:- Who Knew What, When and How about ÔThe Massacres
that Would Change the Meaning of MassacreÕÓ: The Committee on Armenian Atrocities in New York CityÕs Release for
Publication in Papers of Monday, Oct. 4, 1915Ó, at Groong, Armenian News
Network http://www.groong.org/orig/ak-20141004.html. This entry included as well in Lord
BryceÕs The Treatment of the Ottoman
Empire, documents presented to Viscount Grey of Fallodon,
Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Hodder and Stoughton, London, New
York and Toronto 1916, pp. 262-264, and subsequent unredacted modern
editions.) We can merely mention
here DavisÕs supposed involvement in a Òleak to the pressÓ about events at
Harput in the summer of 1915. It is
an early example of the nowadays typical Òtempests in a teapotÓ
complaints. This complaint about
Consul Davis was orally lodged by the Ottoman government to the American
Embassy and concerned what might be called Òan unappreciated leakÓ. Abram Elkus, Henry MorgenthauÕs
replacement at Constantinople, ended up having to deal with the episode and
other elaborate exaggerations from the Turkish side. See United States National Archives
867.4016/313.
[36] For example T. Hofmann and G. Koutcharian (1992) cited above at
18; A.T. Wegner and A.M. Samuelli Armin T. Wegner e gli Armeni in Anatolia,
1915 : immagini e testimonianze = Armin T. Wegner and the Armenians in
Anatolia, 1915 : images and testimonies, Milano: Guerini e Associati 1996;
Ulrich Klan Armin T. Wegner - Bildnis einer Stimme Begleitbuch, Gšttingen:WallsteinVerlag
2008; Armin T. Wegner, Andreas Meier and Wolfgang
Gust Die Austreibung des
armenischen Volkes in die WŸste : ein Lichtbildvortrag, Gšttingen:
WallsteinVerlag 2011; A.D. Krikorian and E.L. Taylor ÒAchieving ever-greater precision in
attestation and attribution of genocide photographsÓ in Tessa Hofmann, Matthias Bj¿rnlund, Vasileios
Meichanetsidis (eds.), The
Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks, Studies on the state sponsored campaign of
extermination of the Christians of Asia Minor, 1912-1922 and its aftermath:
history, law, memory, New York and Athens: Aristide D. Caratzas 2011.
[37] ÒPosition of the American Media on the Armenian GenocideÓ from
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position_of_the_media_on_the_Armenian_Genocide; also J.A. Thomas ÒPhotography,
National Identity, and the ÔCataract of TimesÕ: Wartime Images and the Case of
Japan,Ó The American Historical Review 103, 1998, pp.1475-1501.
Redistribution of Groong articles,
such as this one, to any other media, including but not limited to other
mailing lists and Usenet bulletin boards, is strictly prohibited without
prior written consent from Groong's Administrator. Copyright 2017 Armenian News
Network/Groong. All Rights Reserved. |
| Home | Administrative | Introduction | Armenian News | World News | Feedback |