Armenian News
Network / Groong
Armenian
Christmas, Theophany, Epiphany, “Little Christmas”, and especially “Le Petit
Noël”: trying to make sense of a December 23, 1905 cartoon and its caption.
Armenian News Network / Groong
Special to Groong by Abraham D. Krikorian and Eugene L. Taylor
LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK
January 6, 2017
The
Gregorian calendar that we are all familiar with was promulgated during the
reign of Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XIII.
The order for change was issued as a Papal Bull in 1582. According to Christian tradition, the
celebration of epiphany or theophany, 12 days after Christmas, commemorates the
manifestation of Jesus as Son of God through his baptism and at the same time,
the manifestation of the Holy Trinity. For
some, it also signifies the manifestation of Jesus to the Magi etc.
The
Armenian church celebrates the Nativity as Part of the Theophany/Epiphany. This year the “Feast of the Nativity and
Theophany of Our Lord Jesus Christ” falls on a Friday, the date stands as
always at 6 January according to the Julian calendar.
As
a source of poignant cartoons and satirical illustrations one has to put at the
top of the list the satirical weekly L’Assiette
au Beurre. Published in Paris at fairly
regular intervals between 1901 and 1936, it had decidedly socialist leanings
and would nowadays be viewed as an “activist publication”. [The title translates literally as The Butter Plate. Indeed, its name refers sarcastically to the
fact that the ‘peasants’ and workers, the proletariat if you will, rarely could
afford butter on the table. The
expression seems to have been a bit of an ‘in-joke’ and would probably be
referred to us today as implicating ‘pork barrel gains’ or ‘gravy train benefits’
or ill-gotten gains.]
Some
will recall that we have an interest in cartoons. Some of these are not always easy to
interpret. After all, in many cases the
ones of special interest to us are much more than a hundred years old. Inevitably, it is often a challenge to
contextualize the images precisely. Most
of the time, they are not for some of us today what they might at first glance
appear to be or represent.
Sultan
Abdul Hamid II was a cartoonist’s and caricaturist’s dream fulfilled. In like manner, German Kaiser Wilhelm II
easily fell into the same category – some might say they were meant for
each other and often shared the same tableaux.
Not
so long ago, when going through our collection of cartoons, we encountered an
issue of L’Assiette” captioned NOЁLS! [Christmases] - 23 December 1905 issue No. 247) featuring images
by [Tomas] Leal da Camara (1876-1948. Camara
was born in the Portuguese colony of Goa, now the Indian state of Goa, and
operated out of several locales over his career and ultimately from the small
city of Porto near Lisbon in Portugal where he died). We think he was incredibly talented and quite
original in his themes and depictions.
While
all the caricatures in that issue with cartoons by Camara are very interesting,
the ones that especially attracted us were in a cartoon on page 622 entitled
“Le Petit NOЁL de l’Europe” [The Little Christmas of Europe].
We
are all familiar with Santa Claus, and some of us with Father Christmas,
Armenians with Gharant Baba, Spanish speakers with Papá Noel, Italians with
Babbo Natale, French speakers with Père Noël.
We suspect fewer will be familiar with Le Pétit Jésus or le Petit Noël. In any case, he may perhaps be best described
as a giver of gifts represented in one way or other by or with the baby Jesus.
In
this cartoon Little Santa Claus is hardly ‘little’ and he is hardly the helper
one would like to imagine or picture as a ‘Santa’s helper’!
Against
this minimal background, we can see in the cartoon a huge, uniformed, thuggish,
avaricious-looking hoodlum and bully in the form of German Kaiser Wilhelm II. He is clutching in his left arm the Sultan of
Morocco, Mulai Abd el-Aziz. The Sultan seems
very distressed. The thug clutches the wily
Turkish Sultan Abdul Hamid II in his right arm.
Sultan Abdul Hamid displays a less distressed and more resigned gaze.
The thug is grabbing [‘be-gifting’ himself?] with the Turkish Empire and hopefully,
Morocco (Morocco, unlike Algeria was never a part of the Ottoman Empire).
The
Kaiser had already secured the cooperation, and even compliance of the Turkish
potentate and had considerable influence at Constantinople. The influence of the British at
Constantinople was described as “nil” in this period, partly as a result of the
outcry occasioned in England over the Armenian massacres. These had gone far to alienate her from the
Sultan. Recall that it was around this
time that the pejorative epithets of “Abdul the Damned”, “The Red Sultan” and “The
Great Assassin” were cast on Abdul Hamid.
On
the other hand, Germany at the time of the massacres and after, had reached out
to the Sultan and Kaiser Wilhelm II was warmly received by the Sultan on two visits. The extended hospitality was given if only to
make it clear that friendliness from a power in Europe like the German Kaiser
was most welcome. For this, the always-suspicious
and wary Sultan had granted privileges to Germany in railroad building
etc.
The
Sultan of Morocco was placed in a bind when the Kaiser invited himself and made
a sojourn to Morocco in the form of a state visit - he was supposedly only actually seeking an appropriate
port on Morocco’s Atlantic coast. (Germany claimed it had no territorial
interests.) France, of course, viewed Morocco as in her purview. Her colonies in French West Africa were big-time
investments, and were a source of raw materials, and hence revenue. The efforts of France to ‘civilize’ (and
exploit) Morocco were seen as very appropriate, and ‘natural’, and indeed
England thought that France would be the best civilizing influence - even more
so than she (in reality Britain having bigger fish to fry). As long as the Straits of Gibraltar were kept
open for England, John Bull could care less about Morocco.
Any
visit from German Kaiser Wilhelm II in Morocco was seen by France as a severe
and unacceptable encroachment. After
all, “l’honneur de la France” [the honor of France] was at stake. At a different time, it would have been seen per se as a cause for war.
In
a word, the cartoon is definitely anti-German.
After all, Camara was tightly connected to “L’Assiette” and had several
issues to his credit featuring his work exclusively. To us, this means that all said and done, and
taken into consideration, Camara knew what side his bread was buttered on! He seems to have been a pragmatist. [Recall
the old Arab saying, ‘We speak now not of principle, we speak of life and
death!’ or some such.] (Probably
apocryphal?)
The
imagery of the cartoon is fairly clear-cut.
Sultan Abdul Hamid II looks pretty much as he should in caricature. See for example cartoon images in our Groong Papers
cited in the Appendix.
However,
the depiction of Kaiser Wilhelm II is a bit atypical. This image looks more ‘generic’ and gross if
you will. Some of the early British
cartoons of the Kaiser show him to be rather heavy. Here, he lacks the moustache so typical of
him in later caricature. But, he is abundantly
militaristic and wears the Prussian Pickelhaube spiked German helmet. Note also that he wears a cannon-shaped ear
ring in his right earlobe - presumably to hint that he has inclinations to
behave like a “grabby” pirate anxious for plunder. He also wears a cannon pendant around his
neck. Kaiser Wilhelm certainly would not
have appreciated this insulting imagery.
Perhaps
Leal da Camara opted to use the image of a barbarian conqueror or Hun to portray
the Kaiser here rather than the more widespread caricature style used for
Wilhelm. We will not go into detail here
about Germans being referred to as “Huns” as a result of Kaiser Wilhelm II’s
infamous speech given in July 1900 to German troops on their way to China to
punish the Chinese for their role in the Boxer Rebellion, and their responsibility
for the deaths of Germans. (Other
Europeans were killed of course but the Kaiser was preoccupied with the German
losses. (He even tried to get Sultan Abdul
Hamid II to intervene and stop Muslim Chinese from participating in the
fighting and atrocities but it was too late to do anything.)
We
shall forego here any opportunity to say anything about cartoons wherein Germans
are represented as Huns. In future, we
will take the opportunity to concentrate on Kaiser Wilhelm II and Sultan Abdul
Hamid II in caricature and cartoons and their significance for Armenian issues
and massacres in particular.
To
wrap up this short presentation on this initially elusive cartoon, we shall
merely end on this note.
Christmas
presents, after all, are Christmas presents – no matter their nature,
size, source or value.
APPENDIX
So
far as the image of Sultan Abdul Hamid II is concerned, reference may be made
to a couple of posts made by us on Groong.
See e.g. “PAPIER D’ARMÉNIE” - Who Today with Armenian Roots or
Connections Knows Anything about “Papier d’Arménie?” A request for information if anyone has ever
heard of it, or better yet used it. Commentary
on a Cartoon Featuring Various European Powers at an Elegant Parisian House of
Fashion Anticipating the Opening of the Peace Conference at The Hague on 18 May
1899. Sultan Abdul Hamid II is
approached by a seller of the deodorant “Papier d’Arménie.” This seemingly simple act has a story to
tell. March 18, 2014 at http://groong.usc.edu/orig/ak-20140318.html
Also-
“Sultan Abdul Hamid II: What
did he really look like? Caricatures
versus photographs.” September 21, 2014 at http://groong.usc.edu/orig/ak-20140921.html
Redistribution of Groong articles, such as
this one, to any other media, including but not limited to other mailing
lists and Usenet bulletin boards, is strictly prohibited without prior
written consent from Groong's
Administrator. |
| Home | Administrative
| Introduction
| Armenian
News | World News | Feedback |